Andy
Senior Member (Voting rights)
Full title: Basic emotions reported by individuals with persistent physical symptoms receiving exposure therapy versus healthy lifestyle promotion in primary care
Analyses drew on data from a randomized controlled trial that compared internet-delivered exposure therapy with healthy lifestyle promotion for patients with PPS (n = 159), supplemented by data from age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers (n = 160). Participants self-reported emotions related to their physical symptoms. Mean differences were evaluated within a linear regression modeling framework.
Compared with the healthy volunteers, PPS participants scored significantly higher on anger, disgust, fear, sadness, and shame, and lower on joy. Disgust, fear, sadness, and shame correlated significantly with somatic symptom burden; anger, fear, sadness, and shame with disability. All negatively valenced emotions reduced significantly in both interventions, without significant between-group effects. Joy increased significantly in exposure. These results highlight the potential relevance of diverse emotions in PPS. To facilitate personalized care, future work could evaluate the unique contribution of specific emotions to clinical outcomes.
Open access
Abstract
The importance of fear has been emphasized in research and treatment focusing on persistent physical symptoms (PPS). Recognizing a broader range of emotions may inform theory and personalized care. This study aimed to examine what basic emotions individuals with PPS experience related to their physical symptoms, the correlations between such emotions and overall somatic symptom burden and disability, and whether emotions change with treatment.Analyses drew on data from a randomized controlled trial that compared internet-delivered exposure therapy with healthy lifestyle promotion for patients with PPS (n = 159), supplemented by data from age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers (n = 160). Participants self-reported emotions related to their physical symptoms. Mean differences were evaluated within a linear regression modeling framework.
Compared with the healthy volunteers, PPS participants scored significantly higher on anger, disgust, fear, sadness, and shame, and lower on joy. Disgust, fear, sadness, and shame correlated significantly with somatic symptom burden; anger, fear, sadness, and shame with disability. All negatively valenced emotions reduced significantly in both interventions, without significant between-group effects. Joy increased significantly in exposure. These results highlight the potential relevance of diverse emotions in PPS. To facilitate personalized care, future work could evaluate the unique contribution of specific emotions to clinical outcomes.
Open access