Articles by Elke Hausmann, GP

Sly Saint

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Book review: The Lady’s Handbook for her Mysterious Illness by Sarah Ramey

review by Elke Hausmann GP

Sarah Ramey was 21 when she first became ill, and 17 years later this book, which is so much more than an illness memoir, was published, 10 years after she first started writing it. It was published in April 2020, which is a shame, as, because of the COVID pandemic restrictions at the time, it did not get the book launch events it should have had, likely resulting in a lack of awareness for many potential readers.

This is even more unfortunate considering that the pandemic has brought about a whole new potential readership of ‘women [and men] with mysterious illnesses’ (or shall I say Long COVID). It matters that women get more of these ‘mysterious illnesses’ (for example, illnesses that don’t readily show up on any of the routine tests doctors tend to do), as is discussed in detail in the book. But men get them too, and when they do, they get a very similar reception from doctors and society as women have always done (disbelief, psychologisation, and in Sarah’s case, downright cruelty). This is not about men and women, this is about what are considered masculine attributes being seen as positive and feminine ones as negative.

Sarah was a ‘normal’, ‘healthy’ American girl and young woman before she became ill. She is the daughter of two ‘top notch’ doctors and the granddaughter of a well known endocrinologist grandmother. She was not the ‘typical woman’ to get myalgic encephalomyelitis or chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) – or was she?

ME/CFS isn’t the only one of the medical conditions she developed, some of them she describes actually resulting from overt medical malpractice, her account of which is often quite shocking to read. Remarkably, her book is at times also desperately funny.

Lucky for us, due to what she describes as her ‘privileged’ position (the support of her family, also financially), she has been able to read and think deeply about her experience and she has produced a book that I would recommend to any patient with a ‘mysterious illness’ (but of course it would be unrealistic to expect that most of our patients would want to read all of the 432 pages).

However, I think that doctors, and particularly GPs, could gain a lot from engaging with her experience and thinking. When I did a presentation updating my GP colleagues in my practice on Long COVID and ME/CFS the other week, I was asked the question of how we can give our patients with those conditions hope, especially if they come back to us after having gone through a Long COVID clinic or a CFS service, without much improvement or an ongoing treatment plan. My answer prior to reading this book was insufficient.

I said that it was wrong to give patients false hope that they would definitely get better, when we don’t yet have the data to show that that is the case for anyone with Long COVID, and when the experience from ME/CFS is that patients can be ill for 10, 20, 30 years – some get better, some get worse, some die, as has happened again recently in the case of Maeve Boothby O’Neill which has gone to inquest to determine failures of the NHS as a system and NHS doctors in her care.1 Rather than talking, what we can do as GPs is to sit with a patient, to let them talk and to truly listen to them. A patient who feels heard and seen will feel that little bit better about herself when she leaves the consulting room, which may then make it that little bit easier for her to cope with her illness. And it’s a definite improvement from many patients reporting that a visit to their GP actually makes them feel worse.
full article here https://bjgplife.com/book-review-the-ladys-handbook-for-her-mysterious-illness/

see also thread
https://www.s4me.info/threads/artic...-dismissing-as-nervous-nellies-apr-2020.14536
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Copied post


This one is particularly good by a UK GP with Long Covid,
Elke Hausmann

Re: Patients with severe ME/CFS need hope and expert multidisciplinary care - Hope comes from progress through biomedical research

There's a very good section distinguishing clearly between complementary medicine in cancer that may help with coping, and problems when the same thing is promoted for ME/CFS as if it were a treatment.

I particularly appreciate the criticism of Paul Garner, not named but clearly meant in the section I have bolded below:

There have always been anecdotes of patients' cancers being cured because of a positive attitude, or following a certain diet, or adopting a stress-free life. It seems that only in ME, one anecdote of illness recovery (from the related condition Long Covid), because it happens to come from a doctor, gets such prominence that it informs whole groups of medics to go down the route of thinking that this is the path to a cure, when most patients would easily recognise that we are talking at best about 'complementary therapy' here (which at worst can even be detrimental to recovery, see graded exercise therapy).

Those medics have the power to dominate the discussion, in medical journals and the wider media. But there are thousands of us, including many doctors with Long Covid or ME, who argue that continuing to invest in researching mind/body approaches is taking away from the real research we need, into understanding the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms at play in ME and Long Covid, which has always been where progress in medicine and medical treatments has come from.
 
Last edited:
Elke Hausmann previously pushed back against Suzanne O'Sullivan

She argues that ‘science must take precedence’ and ignores the huge research literature that makes the case for Long Covid most definitely not being a psychosomatic condition, cherry picking some research that seems to support her view.

When she talks about Long Covid, she is talking about me. She characterises Long Covid as an invented and socially contagious condition, putting doubt into the minds of her readers and listeners about any patient who has Long Covid. As to whether their condition might not really be of psychosomatic origin, and yes, in our society that is still stigmatised (no matter how much she says that it should not be, and insinuates that we are just misunderstanding what psychosomatic conditions are).
 
Amazingly good article in a GP magazine in the UK! Society’s lack of understanding that exercise can cause harm - via the Salt Path controversy to ME/CFS

Elke Hausmann is a GP, not currently working due to Long Covid
What perspective does to someone. It's so appalling think of all the suffering that could have been avoided, in fact what has been artificially created, if only medicine had actually lived up to what they claim to, how patients know our illness best.
It is playing out right now in how we understand and discuss Long Covid, and as we have done in relation to ME for decades. I think one of the main reasons for why we are no further in finding a cure for those conditions is that so many don’t believe that exercise can ever harm.

The hallmark symptom of ME, and arguably the most disabling symptom of severe Long Covid, is post-exertional malaise (PEM), or post-exertional symptoms exacerbation (PESE).7 This symptom is so far removed from healthy people’s experience that they simply cannot imagine it. Words fail us when we are trying to describe what PEM feels like. As the term suggests, PEM hits after exercise (or exertion, which can be cognitive and emotional, as well as physical), generally 24-72 hours later, and is often described as a ‘crash’ (which is an all-encompassing and overwhelming experience, like being in the middle of a hangover, the worst flu, and having just run a marathon, or even been poisoned, all together – this approximation of a description might give healthy people a flavour of what it can feel like, using as metaphors experiences that they might be able to relate to). Until you have experienced it, you cannot really comprehend it. It can be truly terrible. All you can do is lie down and wait it out. And the only way to prevent it is to not overexert yourself, and that threshold is very different for every one person, and even for the same person on different days. For people with PEM, this means no or very limited exercise, and limiting all aspects of living, because ultimately any activity is a form of exertion, physical or otherwise. Patients with very severe PEM may never be able to get out of bed, let alone exercise.

It goes so against our societal bias that exercise is always good for you, that most people will uncritically believe the claims of those doctors who still propose ‘graded exercise therapy’ (GET) as a treatment for Long Covid or ME, long after this has been discredited.8,9 over the voices of patients who are testifying in their many thousands that this is NOT good for us, and can even make us worse.10
This is literally the whole point of having experts. Experts are supposed to do better than random drunk in a pub. What is intuitive or not doesn't matter when experts are involved, they are supposed to have the tools to cut through this.

But here we're stuck with a system in which the very people who got it wrong decide what is right or wrong, it turns out based on nothing but vibes and beliefs. None of this is hard. In fact it's so simple a child can understand it, many do.
 
Thread with a review of Suzanne O'Sullivan's latest book:
 
This is a narrative that the political establishment, presiding over unprecedented levels of chronic illness, disability, economic inactivity and benefit bills, will welcome: the suggestion that ill people can get better, if only they tried hard enough. It places the onus onto the sick individual to get better, and away from the expectation that in a civilised society, the collective should support ill people (who often don’t get better, no matter how hard they try). And remember, ‘they’ can become ‘you’ tomorrow.
This can’t be emphasised enough.
 
Back
Top Bottom