An airway-to-brain sensory pathway mediates influenza-induced sickness 2023 Bin et al

Discussion in 'Other health news and research' started by Andy, Mar 9, 2023.

  1. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    12,552
    Location:
    Canada
    I'm reading around this part of the article and I don't understand what is paradigm-shifting here? This is sickness behavior, what is different about this other than that they didn't know about specific neurons being involved, and possibly which molecules act on it?

    If you'd have put this description to me, I would have thought this is already the paradigm, other maybe than knowing exactly the where and how. What is the current paradigm if not that? The psychosocial stuff?
     
    obeat, Mij, Ravn and 2 others like this.
  2. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    12,552
    Location:
    Canada
    I am seriously baffled at the discussion over the evolutionary aspect of the sickness response and the "paradox" that it's better to alleviate it.

    Because this is exactly what's expected. It has an evolutionary advantage in nature, not in a controlled lab. This is exactly what is expected. This response is not to promote the organism's survival in an artificial setting, an evolutionary response acts as a pressure in a natural environment on a scale of generations.

    Again just the weird expression of puzzlement at finding exactly what's expected is just alarming. Being ill in nature is a good way to get eaten. Being ill in a cage in a lab isn't. No paradox here.
     
    obeat, Sean, bobbler and 5 others like this.
  3. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    27,121
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    I think you are right @rvallee. The finding is just about the specific tissue involved, in mice, responding to the flu. I think it probably isn't paradigm changing, yet at least.

    It just tells us a lot more about how the sickness response happens and raises more questions, better questions.

    The body makes prostaglandins at the site of an infection or tissue damage, and those prostaglandins, acting on prostaglandin receptors in that local tissue can produce a system-wide response that includes changes in behaviours, such as reduced activity. It seems likely that the prostaglandins produce some of their effects directly. For example, some prostaglandins can cause vasodilation, some can cause vasoconstriction, some can activate clot formation, which is handy if there is a cut. But, I don't think we can rule out that the local tissue is mostly just sending a message to the brain via the neurons, and then the brain governs much of the sickness response as has always been thought.

    The reduced sickness response when the particular neurons were cut could mean that a message has to get to the brain to produce a sickness response in the round. But of course, if the neurons with the prostaglandin receptors are dead, then they can't be acting locally either. It makes sense that there are both local and central responses.
     
    Last edited: Mar 10, 2023
    Sean, Ariel, Michelle and 3 others like this.
  4. SNT Gatchaman

    SNT Gatchaman Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,515
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Or maybe "sickness programme"?
     
    Ravn likes this.
  5. Ravn

    Ravn Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,078
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Haven't read the paper but what's most interesting to me is that - assuming I picked this up correctly from the snippets here - is

    1) that the sickness response may be made up of several parts which function independently of each other to some degree, and

    2) that the sickness response may originate in the periphery.

    Point 1 is interesting because to me it doesn't look like our ME symptoms quite match the typical sickness response which includes fever and lack of thirst for example. Some pwME undoubtedly experience those but many don't, and some experience the opposite, too low a body temperature and increased thirst during PEM. So to me the typical sickness response and the ME symptom picture look similar but not quite the same. But could it be that in ME only some selected parts of the standard sickness response are activated (together with plenty of other stuff going wrong at the same time)? Or even that a failure to activate the entire sickness response at the appropriate time is the problem?

    Point 2 is interesting because it points to the possibility of a primary problem in the periphery, not in the brain. Only a possibility though, there's bound to be some primary brain mechanism(s) which can trigger a sickness response, too
     
    RedFox, Mij, Trish and 4 others like this.
  6. JemPD

    JemPD Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,027
    yes my temp tends to drop to low end of normal 36 ish when in PEM with increased thirst, but i also get increased thirst during viral infections, its always been marked that when i am ill i get very thirsty, regardless of the infection. And i rarely lose my appetite unless i have a sickness/diarrhoea bug or a migraine - with flu etc i can still eat its just that what i want changes & obviously its difficult with a sore throat if it hurts too much to swallow.

    I'm just wondering if this discovery in mice might be useful in further investigating any kind of signalling problem in ME @Jonathan Edwards
     
    RedFox, Mij, Trish and 2 others like this.
  7. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    27,121
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    As Rvallee noted, a sickness response pretty much always had to, and has to originate in the periphery, because that is where the infections start. And it makes sense that at least some of the sickness response happens locally, without the brain getting involved e.g. responses to tissue damage.

    I've seen low body temperature also referred to as a possible sickness response symptom. e.g. here:
    and here:
     
    Ravn and Sean like this.
  8. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    7,252
    Location:
    Australia
    Exactly.
    I would not be surprised if there is a whole cascade of stuff from whatever the primary pathology turns out to be.
     
    JemPD, Ravn and Peter Trewhitt like this.
  9. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,672
    Location:
    London, UK
    I suspect not in that the signalling they describe is well known. They have identified some specific airway nerves but that does not seem very relevant to ME.

    I think that the study may serve to remind us that symptoms of feeling ill involve both peripheral and central signal components.

    With flu, or for me in the post Covid weeks, it seems obvious that something is wrong with one's muscles or gut or nerves or joints etc. because they hurt or give other symptoms. But it is unlikely that there is anything wrong with the ability of these tissues to do their jobs other than being inhibited by danger signals.

    It makes sense that these danger signals are coming all the way from the arms and legs or gut. But it is also useful to remember that the brain normally suppresses all sorts of signals from the body and that all we may need to get danger signals from the body is for the brain to turn the 'squelch button' The squelch button is what you had on VHF radios which is there to damp down signals until you can only hear the useful ones from other radios. If you turn squelch up you get lots of noise all the time.

    These mechanisms are to some extent what people talk about in terms of peripheral and central sensitisation but that term has been highjacked by people who have special theories about how it works.
     
    Ravn, FMMM1, Sean and 5 others like this.
  10. Mij

    Mij Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    8,364
    I got Covid or influenza last December. Symptoms involved sore throat, coughing, loss of appetite, no fever for 5 days. I experienced on and off leg muscle fatigue for a little over a week. I went back to baseline 3 weeks later and thought I had recovered, but when I went for my usual 50 minute brisk walk, I got up the next morning and couldn't stand on my legs for 3 weeks from severe leg muscle exhaustion. I had to eat canned food.

    My M.E PEM is a completely different experience. It involves whole body fatigue (arms and legs), dehydration, shakiness, ataxia, slurred speech, cognitive impairment and chest pressure. I had none of that with sickness behaviour.
     
    Ravn, FMMM1, Sean and 1 other person like this.
  11. JemPD

    JemPD Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,027
    yes i get all those too, but they come on top of sickness behaviour, so its like SB Plus. I would never call the weakness from sickness behaviour sensation 'whole body fatigue' - whole body fatigue is a qualitatively different experience for me.

    I'm not trying to say it's about severity - a milder sickness behaviour experience can be much less disabling than PEM, or indeed than severe overwhelming exhaustion, its just a different bodily sensation for me. Which is, for me, unique to having an infection of some kind. So SB experience is identical to ME/PEM, plus the other symptoms added in on top. Although to be fair, when i have had bad doses of flu befor i have experienced some cognitive dysfunction
     
    Ravn, Sean and Peter Trewhitt like this.
  12. Mij

    Mij Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    8,364
    @JemPD

    By SB, which is an adaptive response, are you saying that you feel as though you're fighting an infection during PEM?

    My delayed PEM starts when I've gone over my energy limit. It's worse if I'm dealing with an infection of course, but it's tricky to fully know whether my immune system has cleared the virus from what I experienced recently.
     
    Ravn, Sean and Peter Trewhitt like this.
  13. JemPD

    JemPD Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,027
    oh yes absolutely.

    As i said in my earlier post, (in response to Hutan's question what people thought about ME/CFS= chronic sickness response theory) the experience is identical - which i guess isnt strictly accurate really since i also have the other symptoms we talked about. Its identical & then some other bits on top.
     
    Ravn, Art Vandelay, Sean and 3 others like this.
  14. V.R.T.

    V.R.T. Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    126
    When mild I essentially dosed up on ibuprofen daily for years, which masked the severity of my symptoms and led me to write the illness off as just repeated colds/infections
     
    Ravn, RedFox, Sean and 4 others like this.
  15. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    7,252
    Location:
    Australia
    Technically a (variable threshold) noise gate.

    It is a potentially useful analogy, I think. If so, then the question is whether the noise gate mechanism itself is defective, or is it working properly but the signal it has to deal with has become too strong and/or distorted, and is now outside the normal operating parameters of the otherwise healthy noise gate?

    Might be more than one noise gate mechanism in play too.

    Interestingly, noise gates – at least in electronics – are not a simple on/off switch, they have other variable parameters like attack, hold, and release, and sometimes independent threshold levels for on and off, which may be relevant to understanding biological forms of noise gate.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noise_gate
     
    obeat, Mij, Ravn and 2 others like this.

Share This Page