1. Guest, click here to read the 'News in Brief' post for w/c 8th Dec.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

A MAPP Network Case-control Study of Urological Chronic Pelvic Pain Compared With Nonurological Pain Conditions, 2020, Afari et al

Discussion in 'PsychoSocial ME/CFS Research' started by Andy, Dec 4, 2019.

  1. Andy

    Andy Committee Member & Outreach

    Messages:
    8,107
    Likes Received:
    59,066
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    Not a recommendation.
    Paywall, https://journals.lww.com/clinicalpa...twork_Case_control_Study_of_Urological.2.aspx
    Not available via Scihub at time of posting.
     
    Hutan and James Morris-Lent like this.
  2. James Morris-Lent

    James Morris-Lent Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    606
    Likes Received:
    4,269
    Location:
    United States
    I don't understand why these people think it's plausible that pelvic symptoms would be related to being neurotic or whatever. Unless the idea is that you're so tightly puckered all the time that it starts to hurt?

    (sorry...)
     
    MEMarge and Andy like this.
  3. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,864
    Likes Received:
    22,239
    Location:
    Canada
    The conclusion has nothing to do with, frankly, anything else. If anything it concludes the exact opposite of what the data suggests. What the hell is extraversion even doing there? Decades later and this psychosocial crap is still at the stage of "maybe there could be something there" while doing the same thing over and over again and never actually finding anything. Research where the conclusion is always more research is needed. What's even the point here?

    Stop wasting resources on dumb things like that. And bring back the damn scientific method. This rhetoric-based garbage is a complete waste.
     
    Lisa108 and Mithriel like this.

Share This Page