A Case of Severe Neonatal COVID-19 Pneumonia Requiring Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation Without Long-Term Respiratory Sequelae, 2025, Okada et al.

Chandelier

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
A Case of Severe Neonatal COVID-19 Pneumonia Requiring Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation Without Long-Term Respiratory Sequelae

Okada, Tomoko; Kimura, Sho; Honda, Takafumi; Yasukawa, Kumi; Takanashi, Jun-Ichi

Abstract​

Numerous reports have described severe effects of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) in adults, often accompanied by long-term respiratory sequelae, such as pulmonary fibrosis.
By stark contrast, most pediatric cases of respiratory illness associated with SARS-CoV-2 are mild: severe pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection is rare in children.
Nevertheless, data reflecting long-term respiratory outcomes in this population are scarce.

This report describes prolonged mechanical ventilation for managing a case of severe neonatal pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2.
The patient, a full-term neonate who developed fever at two days of age, was subsequently diagnosed with moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to COVID-19.
Mechanical ventilation was administered for three weeks.
Following extubation, the patient’s respiratory condition improved steadily.
He was discharged without apparent sequelae.
At two-year follow-up, he had no respiratory or other systemic sequelae.
To monitor for potential long-term pulmonary damage, we performed serial chest computed tomography (CT) scans and measured serum KL-6 levels.
The latter were elevated during the acute phase (2,600 U/mL) but decreased to 450 U/mL within three months.
CT imaging initially showed ground-glass opacities, which resolved over time.

This case highlights the possibility of full recovery without long-term respiratory complications, even in neonates with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia requiring prolonged ventilatory support.
This report is among the very few documenting long-term follow-up in this patient population.

Web | DOI | Cureus
 
This case highlights the possibility of full recovery without long-term respiratory complications, even in neonates with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia requiring prolonged ventilatory support.
That's an odd framing. It's been confidently asserted that this is the norm from the very start, minimizing illness in children has been an integral part of the overall minimizing strategy, from denying the possibility to insisting that full recovery is guaranteed if it ever happens.

So to talk about this being a possibility when it's asserted to be the norm is just... strange, a kind of forced, and very fake, naivete.
 
Back
Top Bottom