1. Sign our petition calling on Cochrane to withdraw their review of Exercise Therapy for CFS here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 22nd April 2024 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

$500 000 Gift to OMF - Chris Armstrong

Discussion in 'ME/CFS research news' started by EndME, Aug 4, 2023.

  1. EndME

    EndME Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    875
    We are thrilled to share some exciting news with you! Thanks to the incredible generosity of the McCusker Charitable Foundation, and their commitment to advancing medical research, we are embarking on an unprecedented journey that promises to revolutionize the care of people with ME/CFS and Long COVID by Australian General Practitioners.

    We take immense pride in announcing the gracious gift of $500,000 to Open Medicine Foundation Australia Limited (OMFAL) to fund the initial phase of Dr. Chris Armstrong’s ground-breaking personalized treatment program.

    As an international extension of the Open Medicine Foundation, OMFAL plays a vital role in our global, non-profit effort to understand, manage, and ultimately cure ME/CFS, Long COVID, and related diseases. We are proud to acknowledge the remarkable work of the Melbourne ME/CFS Research Collaboration, directed by esteemed Christopher W. Armstrong, PhD.

    The primary focus of Dr. Armstrong’s personalized treatment program is to provide a tool that clinicians can use to speed up the process of matching successful treatments to individuals with ME/CFS and Long COVID.

    By reducing the guesswork that often prolongs treatment decisions, we envision a future where patients can experience relief and healing faster than ever before.


    Key Aspects of the Research Program:

    1. Partnering with GPs to Target Treatments: We understand that the uncertainty surrounding treatment options can be distressing for patients and their families. By studying how clinical and biological factors can predict successful treatment outcomes, we will work with medical practitioners to develop a tool that they can use to help patients.

    2. Improving Quality of Life: By providing a tool that enables clinicians to provide patients with targeted treatments, we expect to increase the potential for significant improvements to quality of life. These changes will benefit individuals and their families, and also alleviate the stress on our healthcare system.

    3. Clinician Education and Implementation: An essential feature of this program is to educate clinicians about accessing and effectively implementing this tool within their practices. We believe that sharing knowledge and empowering medical professionals will lead to widespread benefits across the medical and patient communities, both within Australia and globally.

    We’d like to emphasize that the pioneering work being done in Australia is not confined by geographic boundaries. The innovative treatment programs we’re developing here have the potential to be replicated and adapted worldwide. This means that the fruits of our research could soon provide hope for ME/CFS and Long COVID patients globally, promising a brighter, healthier future for all.

    We are incredibly grateful to the McCusker Charitable Foundation, who have the vision to recognize the potential of this transformative research. Their remarkable commitment doesn’t end here; they have pledged an additional $500,000 for the following two consecutive years if the research progresses well.

    As we embark on this journey, we promise to keep you informed every step of the way. Your contributions, whether big or small, make a profound difference in achieving our collective goals.

    https://www.omf.ngo/McCusker-gift/
     
    boolybooly, janice, Hutan and 13 others like this.
  2. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    52,387
    Location:
    UK
    Sounds interesting, but what treatment might he be referring to I wonder. I hope they will reveal a lot more information.

    Whoever wrote the announcement swallowed the superlatives thesaurus. Just in the first couple of paragraphs we have:
    thrilled, exciting, incredible, unprecedented, revolutionize, immense, groundbreaking... That's a lot to live up to.
     
  3. DokaGirl

    DokaGirl Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,664
    Agreed.
     
    boolybooly, Ron, alktipping and 2 others like this.
  4. Sid

    Sid Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,057
    There are no treatments, let alone personalised treatments.
     
    boolybooly, Nellie, RedFox and 15 others like this.
  5. InitialConditions

    InitialConditions Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,585
    Location:
    North-West England
    Philanthropic spiel and American enthusiasm is a deadly combination for our language.
     
  6. InitialConditions

    InitialConditions Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,585
    Location:
    North-West England
    It says treatment plan, which is probably a mix of all sorts of medications/supplements/health + diet advice, similar to what they've always done at the Stanford Clinic.
     
    boolybooly, Ron, RedFox and 9 others like this.
  7. voner

    voner Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    222
    And.. the last 3 paragraphs superlatives include: innovative, pioneering, transformative, remarkable, profound….

    this sentence especially seems to stick in my craw,

    This means that the fruits of our research could soon provide hope for ME/CFS and Long COVID patients globally, promising a brighter, healthier future for all."

    That is going to be a very impressive "tool".
     
    Last edited: Aug 5, 2023
    boolybooly, Ron, Sean and 8 others like this.
  8. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,114
    boolybooly, DokaGirl and oldtimer like this.
  9. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    52,387
    Location:
    UK
    Personalized treatment trials

    We will partner with a small team of clinicians in Melbourne to recruit 200 patients for this trial.* The plan? Collaborate with clinicians to monitor the biological effects of prescribed treatments. The understanding of successful and unsuccessful treatments will be honed by analyzing biological changes in response to these treatments.

    Patient reports, objective clinical measures and thousands of biomarkers will be assessed for each treatment that is tried. By analyzing and categorizing biological changes that occur in response to treatments, we can better understand why these treatments might be effective or ineffective. We can then determine the type of people for which certain treatments might be effective.

    The more people we study and data we gather, the better we can predict which treatments will work best in the future.

    We expect this project to take approximately 3 years from the initial recruitment. On average, each patient will undergo testing for 3+ months and will go through 2+ treatment trials, including 3 clinic visits (which will include MRI/PET scans) and the analysis of hundreds of collected biofluid samples.
     
    boolybooly, Sean, Hutan and 7 others like this.
  10. Solstice

    Solstice Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,172
    Sounds pretty good to me.
     
    Jaybee00, DokaGirl and oldtimer like this.
  11. DokaGirl

    DokaGirl Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,664
    Agreed, from a rather disillusioned, Canadian.
     
    alktipping and InitialConditions like this.
  12. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    9,590
    Location:
    UK
    meh, Griffith Uni regularly come up with much the same kind of over exuberance.
     
  13. MeSci

    MeSci Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,510
    Location:
    Cornwall, UK
    It seems to be increasingly common, including in how politicians speak. It's common in documentaries too now, which I get so fed up with that I switch off.
     
  14. Solstice

    Solstice Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,172
    Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious
     
  15. NelliePledge

    NelliePledge Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,309
    Location:
    UK West Midlands
    The sound of it is something quite atrocious

    the hype that is
     
    vsou, Trish, Sid and 3 others like this.
  16. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    52,387
    Location:
    UK
    It's a pity it's being wrapped up in all these superlatives, when actually it sounds like a very interesting and potentially productive way to go about researching the physiological effects of different treatments on pwME.
     
  17. RedFox

    RedFox Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,246
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    I wish everyone would cut the marketing crap. Not just ME/CFS, everywhere in life.
     
    TiredSam, DMissa, sebaaa and 7 others like this.
  18. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    26,961
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Reading that, it sounds less like treatments and more like a decision tool. Could it just be a database with details of patients who are trying various treatments and records of their various outcomes, with an interface where GPs can say 'I have a 45 year old female with Covid-19 onset ME/CFS and muscle pain', what treatments have helped people like her?
    That quote suggests that there are treatments that provide relief and healing, it's just hard to know which patients need which treatment. Unless I missed something, we are nowhere near that relatively happy state of affairs.

    Also, as much as I like Chris Armstrong, I don't think we've seen much evidence of engagement with people with ME/CFS in terms of planning and implementing research from his team.

    It's perhaps even more of a problem that, when I last looked, which admittedly was a while ago, OMFAL did not have a single person with self-declared ME/CFS on their board. That contributes to the idea that people with ME/CFS are not rational and are not capable of contributing to decisions made about investigations into their disease, and so we should just wait while others do the decision-making for us. I think OMFAL should be doing much much better on the 'nothing about us without us' idea.
     

Share This Page