retraction watch

How the Lancet lost our trust Stuart Ritchie The Spectator (UK) 26/06/2021 A few of us have tried to get Ritchie interested in the PACE trial, but he has previously refused. But since it now seems to support his argument, he does cautiously mention it...

The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/leap.1282 https://sci-hub.tw/10.1002/leap.1282

‘We badly need to change processes’: How ‘slow, opaque and inconsistent’ journals’ responses to misconduct can be.

https://retractionwatch.com/2019/04/17/plos-one-pulls-highly-cited-mindfulness-paper-over-undeclared-ties-other-concerns/ Chalk another one up for James Coyne. I'm in two minds about Professor Coyne: his abrasive approach is quite often detrimental, in my view, especially for a patient...

Article claiming acupuncture on parents would treat their kids through quantum entanglement has been retracted. https://retractionwatch.com/2019/04/08/article-claiming-acupuncture-on-parents-would-treat-their-kids-through-quantum-entanglement-has-been-retracted/ I think the title of this says...

Another example from Retraction Watch as to how wonderful the Peer Review process is! :rolleyes: https://retractionwatch.com/2019/02/08/chem-journal-yanks-paper-because-authors-had-stolen-it-as-peer-reviewers/

From Retraction Watch... Remind you of anyone or anything? :rolleyes:

https://retractionwatch.com/2019/01/16/we-regret-our-delay-plos-one-retracts-two-papers/

Sorry, not PACE. https://retractionwatch.com/2018/07/03/a-university-went-to-great-lengths-to-block-the-release-of-information-about-a-trial-gone-wrong-a-reporter-fought-them-and-revealed-the-truth/

https://retractionwatch.com/2017/12/19/official-journals-behave-badly-punishment/ I doubt we should get out hopes up about the Lancet getting any punishment though.