nick brown

New blog post about fraud and research misconduct in scientific research. https://mecfsskeptic.com/how-many-scientific-papers-are-fake/ Twitter summary: 1) How many scientific papers are fake? A new review argues that fabrication and falsification of scientific results may be more common...

BMJ has "corrected" the Lightning Process study but has allowed its conclusions to stand, as far as I can tell. I will have more to say about this. Apparently, the authors have convinced the journal that the outcome swapping had nothing to do with the fact that the revised primary outcome had...

Data look dodgy but the authors won't share them with Nick. https://steamtraen.blogspot.com/2018/10/just-another-week-in-real-world-science.html?m=0 Blog post about this study: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924933817322605

My latest letter to Archives of Disease in Childhood I sent the following e-mail today to Dr Nick Brown, the editor-in-chief of Archives of Disease in Childhood, the journal that published the Lightning Process study a year ago. I cc’d Dr Fiona Godlee, editorial director of BMJ, which publishes...

It's about the 'data thugs' who have been challenging junk science, Nick Brown, James Heathers and Jordan Anaya...

Trial By Error: The Contentless “Editor’s Note” About the Lightning Process Trial http://www.virology.ws/2018/07/16/trial-by-error-the-contentless-editors-note-about-the-lightning-process-trial/ 16 July 2018 By David Tuller, DrPH Last week, I noticed that Nick Brown, the editor-in-chief of...