I'm struggling to read long stuff at the moment but I couldn't see anything in the article that really explained how they were going to do things differently.
We may have talked about this before, but what will be the trigger for getting us put into a particular speciality? Formally published DecodeME results? A positive dara trial? Something else?
Is part of the problem that we don't belong to a particular discipline? For example, we're not in rheumatology so we can't get normal rheumatology care?
Scary.
This is a crucial statement and it's amazing that it needs to be pointed out. My impression is that people have reconceptualised ME/CFS as a temporary state simply in order to be able to apply rehabilitation to it.
Generally, the more you say, the less people read, and the easier it is for them to focus on minor points and dodge the big ones. I favour documents that are as short as possible, in general. But I haven't even read the guide, yet.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup::thumbup:
Run out of thumbs. We've needed a paper like this forever.
I also had a look at studies on transdermal absorption when I was initially looking into this and IIRC there were quite a lot of contradictory ones but in the end I landed on it sounding as though there was reasonable absorption particularly if the concentration of Mg in the water is high, and...
But they tell you they think people who say they have ME are deluded but people who say they have CFS aren't? This is a big surprise to me, but of course no one is ever going to say this kind of stuff to our faces (apart from doctors).
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.