They have to assert that we are pathetic incompetent wretches who fall apart at the first whiff of difficulties in life, and maybe even malingerers and frauds as well. Otherwise their 'model' doesn't work from the start.
In contrast, there was no significant association between full acceptance by patients and their recovery.
So the point of trying to 'change patients somatic perceptions' is...?
And how did they measure 'recovery'?
What happens if the patient doesn't 'comply' with these new health dictates?
Translation: If our therapy doesn't work for you, it is your fault.
The expansion of the empire continues... and always will.
––––––––––––
Apart from Acceptability, which is of limited value, this is the standard...
They also said that when patients did not get better that they were given a different diagnosis before being sent home.
How is this not fraud?
Very disappointing choice, MEA.
They really don't do irony, do they.
Exactly. This whole performative dance around methodology by the BPS camp is because they are consistently unable to deliver any clear benefit.
IOW, people who are more compliant, less confrontational and disruptive. Less 'difficult'.
Problem is that real change for the better is rarely done by such people. It is done by those who don't like what they see around them, and do something about it, including demanding that those in power...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.