Maybe nog the right thread, so feel free to move this to another thread, mods.
But are there any online sources to learn more about cells/immunity if you do not have a science background? Just 2 years of biology in secondary school.
Ugh a Great Barrington defender, charming
https://www.panaccindex.info/p/ucsfs-vinay-prasad-profits-from-child
Here an article, with more info about him. Do not know the reliability of the source.
Yes make sure that you have old style double glazing! Hr++ glazing can suffer from heatshock and crack.
I did see some specials hr++ foils.
I did the tin foil on old style double glazing and it really works. I did put it inside, since I can’t put it on the outside.
As long as there is no reliable care path for ME, I would not want to go to hospital, virtual or non-virtual.
However I did get IV-therapy at home. And I was really happy to not have to go hospital several times a week.
It saves a lot of energy, and the sensory issues in hospitals are horrible.
Summer is helllll.
Previously houses in NL had traditional double glazing. The glass kept heat out in summer and cold out in winter
Now this has been replaced by hr++ glazing. That keeps heat inside, ok in winter but in summer it is like a sauna.
My dream would be to oversummer in a cooler...
Sorry that you are dealing with this. It sounds tough.
I would not know what this would be called.
Have you tried a symptom checker such as symptoma or webmd? Or discuss it with your doctor?
Hope you will find help/ answers that will offer some relief.
I found this review on NK cell disfunction in ME.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31727160/
Is this robust enough to speak of NK cell disfunction in ME?
Honest question, do not have a science background.
Edit; and if not, what would it need to become more of a robust finding?
Keeping statistics on disease is important for various reasons:
It gives an indication on how large the problem is
funding is often determined on number of patients
It also informs governments on the effectiveness of treatments
To know the prevalence and impact of a disease
Feel free to add...
To pick one aspect, the peer review;
just having 2/3 peer reviewers;
usually the editor who decides who are the peer reviewers
seems like a huge risk of bias.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.