Search results

I received these a little while ago. See https://www.s4me.info/threads/correspondence-from-the-dwp-for-2003.2682/ 17 files.

I'll start a new thread with them. Thanks for all your work on the summary of these. Edit: https://www.s4me.info/threads/correspondence-from-the-dwp-for-2004.2771/

Last one is too big. Available here https://www.dropbox.com/s/jg51a4hlbpgvyjl/507_19_01%2010%202003_MA%20to%20TA.PDF?dl=0

Oops. Can't count. 21 files in all. Part 4.

Part 3.

Part 2.

I have previously shared the correspondence for 2004. Here it is for 2003. I am getting these as and when I can. There is a limit to how much they will release and how often. Even if someone else asks it won't help as it will be seen as the same request. I'll post more when I get them. I have...

They're being disingenuous. I'd rather not discuss it too much until the process is complete. I'm sure you understand why.

I liked the decision much more on a second reading. It is worth remembering this is a legal process and the ICO does not want to be appealed to the IT. They have to show they're being reasonable and have considered all the points made. It is disappointing the AfME contributions will be redacted...

Update. This actually made me laugh: I have heard back from KCL and... They don't hold the data either apparently. I shall be asking them to review the decision. I have now prepared my appeal on the QMUL decision and shall be mailing it at the start of next week.

Update. I have been reading the thread, but haven't been able to respond for the obvious reason. QMUL has 35 calendar days to provide the information (from the date of the decision). The other questions about redactions etc are answered in the decision itself, which I have now scanned and...

Thanks for your concern, Luther (hehe). 1. So far no it hasn't. I have been doing everything online. The PACE data appeal, which I have been working on this week, will need to go through the post, but printing and mailing should be <£10 so manageable. If it starts requiring massive amounts of...

Thanks. It relied heavily on data released by Alem so it's very much his work as well. 35 calendar days to release. They can appeal, but decision suggests there have been negotiations between QMUL and ICO on what can be redacted, and my impression is that this time they won't appeal.

Yes.

Just received decision in the post. Not read it all but ICO has ordered release of TSC and TMG minutes.

Would you be able and willing then to answer some detailed questions I have? (If so, I think it better in private, if that's OK. I don't want to sound too green ink, but I understand these forums are sometimes monitored.)

I went back to the MRC and checked some of the redactions. They said: On pages 12 and 13 the name of a Research Assistant intended to work of the study has been redacted. Research Assistants are generally junior positions and the name has been withheld under section 40(2) of the Freedom of...

Yeah, Nick is well aware of it, and SMILE.

Thank you for all your comments. I don't have the time unfortunately (for the obvious reason) to reply to everything. I have noted some points, though much of what has been argued I put to the ICO when she told me in October she was minded to find the way she has. My impression (partly on the...