Perhaps the actual story goes like this: The Cochrane editorial team decided to give the authors of the review a last chance to respond...
Thank you, @TiredSam -- if my brain had been on the spot, I should have spotted the "on" (another challenge: if clauses!). Thank you, @Andy...
Perhaps we will know more next week? -> Apologies for both, @Andy, if I didn't see you posting about this earlier and for not being sure what...
"Edited to add" (I think) ETA: nothing to do with travel or political violence....
So it would perhaps be better not to trumpet that/ blare that idea out? (Just thinking...)
Would it not be an appropriate sign of taking patients serioulsy if NICE did let the stakeholders ( I don't know the proper words ATM - I mean all...
This bothers me. They picked a paper that is quite contrary to the point I have been and keep trying to make -- that there are some MS clinicians...
Couldn't this be the review's gist then: To display the poor evidence? Edit: Perhaps combining @Jonathan Edwards ' and @Adrian 's suggestions...
Just saw this prominently placed on Cochrane's website. Is this new? [IMG] http://crowd.cochrane.org/index.html
Those additions look additionaly bad. :grumpy: Are there any positions still open? If anyone feels up to answer: How will the committee make...
I think that is an important question. Did this view enter any textbook, compendium etc.? Have no access to the article and at a first glance...
The English wikipedia page on the history of neurology could be helpful to start with. It's wikipedia (no reliable source), but you might find...
Indeed I'm outside the UK (physically at least). I wonder where Jonathan Edwards and strategist are? (Apparently both could not access the full...
That's strange. I can't see any figures. The "authors' conclusions, Background, Objectives, Methods, Results, Discussion" for me all have a lock...
The link doesn't direct me to the full version, just the abstract and the authors' summary in alleged plain language.
Interesting. Perhaps the "technical team" at work? (Edit: I was meaning: perhaps an IT problem.) Will you contact them? Edit: The Exercise...
It means that unless you have access via an institution you have to pay 6$ to "Unlock the potential of Cochrane evidence"
[MEDIA] (bolding and italics added) Where do you learn those things?
We know it is possible to be both patient and doctor, Clare. Some of us ME sufferers are doctors too.
Her reply to Keith Geraghty is screen saved. I also screen saved her first reply to Trish and her statements re accountability/ authority . Will...
Separate names with a comma.
