Thanks for bringing it to my attention! it had been off my radar. I'd assumed they'd been corrected as a matter of course although in the back of...
This of course made me laugh. I guess we'll see what happens next. They did have a turnover after Teresa Allen left. She was the HRA official I...
I've actually heard/seen this routinely in UK press and media, and it always feels sightly off to me. So it's a real thing. I assume grammatically...
But I agree, they SHOULD be interested. The fact that they only really look at "retractions" obviously leaves a big gap in their coverage. I tried...
Good idea, but they're really interested in retractions, not corrections.
interesting--in American English we use the singular for organizations/agencies/etc, not the plural: "...the HRA has to say about this failure to...
https://www.virology.ws/2022/08/29/trial-by-error-professor-crawley-was-asked-to-correct-ethics-statements-in-11-papers-7-are-still-uncorrected/
I have a post on this, but Virology Blog is down for one of those reasons I don't get. I'll have to wait till Professor Racaniello fixes it or...
It's true. I've checked the papers against the recommended corrections, and most of the 11 papers have not been corrected. I don't know if there...
Thanks for checking into this! I've been meaning for a while to check, and haven't gotten around to it. Someone else had also pointed out to me...
He's retiring? Interesting.
I'm sure it will be a talk just bursting with powerful manly thoughts.
Who are Peter and Susanne la Cour in this debate?
It is truly unbelievable from any objective perspective that this person continues to get research funding and, presumably, still has a decent...
Is this "functional medicine," which is an alternative medicine movement in the US at least that uses "functional" with a different meaning than...
i agree with you! it makes no sense. All I was saying was that they always said it was a feasibility study.
to be fair (even) to Trudie Chalder, they did call it a feasibility trial in the protocol. it's true the findings suggest this is a dead end so...
I haven't read the paper, but do they explain why the identified "response shift" doesn't change the apparent effect of the intervention? Why...
Do you mean because it should have been assumed that the more robust masks did a better job?
I had to read it 2-3 times to understand it. The sentence had a lot of moving parts.
Separate names with a comma.
