Not sure they find it that hard ...
I think this point ... ... needs to be made much more clearly, as a form of harm. At the moment it is lost, on its own, amongst lots of text, and...
Even if it could not distinguish that, if the reduced blood flow proves a significant ME/CFS characteristic, then that would presumably still be...
Are we saying that the more active an area of the brain is, the more oxygen 'flow' it needs to service that need, and thereby higher blood flow to...
"Harm needs to be proved by objective tests" Even though more than happy to accept 'proof' of successful treatment by subjective tests? Even...
Yes, now I am prompted to think about it, you can easily consider a disabled person being very sedentary, and then deciding to become more active,...
Nice to see that someone standing up for pwME and the science-based guideline review, is accurately describing detractors as a "small but vocal...
This is a highly misleading skew of what the new guideline says. It amounts to an untruthful statement from NHS. NICE explicitly says that GET is...
Blinkered, undiluted arrogance is what it stems from I think. "Why am I right? ... Because I am right of course!"
Quite simply, they have no scientific foundation to their claims, and instead strive to dress up their misplaced beliefs as 'evidence'. They...
Done. I waited until I knew if @dave30th's crowdfunding might need a bit more help and if I was going to need to split the difference - but didn't...
Do we have any ideas of how the new guideline will influence: Future ME/CFS research? Currently ongoing ME/CFS research? The guideline clearly...
In the new guideline it says: [ATTACH] Note that it clearly says "Do not offer", so is actively telling medics to not offer any of these...
I think this sums them up in a nutshell: [my bold] And they witter on about evidence!
Excellent @Fainbrog, thanks.
I think that might be the very thing they are frightened may now come to pass. Together with a wider public understanding of why.
[my bold] And still they vehemently defend this unevidenced cr@p.
https://twitter.com/ProfRobHoward
I think from their distorted mindset, it is they only option they can manage.
Cuts to the chase doesn't it :)
Separate names with a comma.
