Using Compression Stockings to Prevent Recurrence of Vasovagal Syncope, 2025, Tavolinejad

Dolphin

Senior Member (Voting Rights)


Get Access
Original Research
4 August 2025

Using Compression Stockings to Prevent Recurrence of Vasovagal Syncope:​


Authors: Hamed Tavolinejad, Ali Bozorgi, Zahra Emkanjoo, Alireza Oraii, Javad Shahabi, Reza Mollazadeh, Mohamadreza Kiarsi, … Show All … , and Masih Tajdini mtajdin1@jh.eduAuthors Info & Affiliations
Publication: JACC
Volume 86, Number 6
https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.05.049#

Abstract​

Background​

Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is a common yet challenging condition with limited effective treatments. Elastic compression stockings (ECS) have been proposed as a potential therapy, but their real-world effectiveness remains unclear.

Objectives​

This study sought to compare the effectiveness of lower extremity compression with thigh-high ECS vs sham stockings for the prevention of VVS recurrence.

Methods​

This multicenter, parallel, blinded, randomized sham-controlled trial enrolled adults 18 to 65 years of age with ≥2 VVS episodes in the past year. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either thigh-length, open-toe active ECS (25-30 mm Hg pressure to the leg), or identical-looking sham ECS (≤10 mm Hg pressure). All participants received standard care (education and lifestyle modifications) but no medications for preventing VVS recurrence. ECS adherence was tracked using diary booklets. The coprimary outcomes were: 1) the proportion of participants with ≥1 VVS recurrence; and 2) the time to first VVS recurrence (ie, VVS-free survival).

Results​

Among 266 participants (mean age 39 years, 58% female), during 12 months of follow-up, VVS recurred in 29.1% (n = 39 of 134) of participants in the treatment group and 34.8% (n = 46 of 132) in the control group (absolute risk reduction: 5.7%; P = 0.315). VVS-free survival was not significantly different (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.53-1.24; P = 0.333). ECS adherence was suboptimal, with discontinuation rates of 37.3% in the treatment arm vs 34.8% in the sham arm. Discontinuation rates, duration of using ECS, and adherence rates were similar between treatment groups. The median number of recurrent episodes was similar (treatment: 2.5 vs sham: 2; P = 0.839). However, significantly fewer VVS episodes occurred while actively wearing ECS (32.7% vs 45.1%; P = 0.024).

Conclusions​

Treating syncope with thigh-high lower limb compression using ECS did not reduce the cumulative incidence of VVS recurrence, and did not change VVS-free survival. Additionally, ECS did not reduce the frequency of multiple VVS episodes. The results do not support routine use of thigh-length ECS, although it may be helpful for selected patients when added to standard care. Because our study specifically tested thigh-high ECS, future studies should aim to assess the effectiveness of more extensive compression targeting pelvic and abdominal venous pooling.
 
I'm selfishly glad to see these results, because I tried compression stockings and couldn't tolerate them for an unexpected reason - they do not play nice with Haglund's deformity (think heels that don't like being squeezed). I tried everything for 3 months - wore cushioned sports sock underneath, wore a lubed-up plaster on heels underneath, cut out a little circle for the sore part of my heels, wore for tiny lengths of time and tried to gradually build up. The stockings were hobbling me. Had to abandon.

They're also just generally very uncomfortable. I was moderate when I tried them, but would not be able to go near them now. I can't wear anything tight at all now - too sore. I'm not surprised that 37% of the study participants in the treatment arm abandoned them too, as did 35% in the sham arm. It would be interesting to know what adverse effects were reported. I'm guessing pain might be up there.

If the study findings are solid, then they would cast doubt on the rationale for lower limb exercise to reduce OI too, though the targeted extra muscle would be there all the time, as opposed to the stockings, which can only work when on.

The editorial @Dolphin posted queries whether the study was adequately powered. Wish we could access the trial and the editorial.
 
Back
Top Bottom