Treatment and outcomes of 95 post-Covid patients with an antidepressant and neurobiological explanations, 2023, Rus et al

Grigor

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Carla C.P. Rus

Bert de Vries

Ingmar E.J. Vries1

Idelette Nutma

J. J. Sandra Kooij2

1 Radboud University,

2 Amsterdam UMC/VUMC

After Covid-19 infection, 12.5% develop a post-Covid-syndrome. Symptoms affect numerous organ systems, but after one year they are mainly neurological and neuropsychiatric in nature. There is evidence that treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) during Covid-19 infection decreases the likelihood of a post-Covid condition, but there is no known research on treating post-Covid syndrome itself with SSRIs.

This study used an exploratory questionnaire and found that 63,4% of 95 post-Covid syndrome patients reported a reasonably good to strong response to an SSRI. Outcomes were measured with three different measures that correlated strongly with each other. Brainfog and sensory overload decreased the most. Patients experienced improved well-being.

The response to SSRIs in post-Covid conditions was explained by seven possible neurobiological mechanisms as reported in the recent literature. The promising results of this study should be followed by a randomized controlled trial.

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3153645/v1
 
The authors Carla Rus has been promoting SSRIs for long-Covid for a while now. She wrote this paper with Idelette Nutma who is a avid Ivermectin promotor.

At the beginning of the pandemic Rus stated that 2/3 of (her) ME patients improved after taking SSRIs. After my criticism they now refer to 1/3rd in the article...

Anyways the paper seems weak on many levels. Patients who were interested joined. Mostly recruited via LinkedIn where both authors are very actively promoting SSRIs.

Chalder Fatigue Scale is not for ME/CFS but for CFS and highly problematic.

Since they're very actively promoting SSRIs on LinkedIn patients have had plenty of positive expectations given again for a placebo effect to explain some of the improvements.

Obviously no control group etc.
 
Last edited:
Long-Covid symptoms mainly being neurological or neuropsychiatric in nature seems like a bold if not simply wrong statement. Considering that in the RECOVER 12 symptom study only 2 of those 12 symptoms, I would consider to be neurological or neuropsychiatric and with those you don't come anywhere close to the 12 points, I don't know how this statement can be justified. I suppose the dutch researchers that view everything as psychological and believe that physiological problems don't exist might argue differently.

They claim that PEM, POTS and other symptoms are mainly neurological or neuropsychiatric is there any evidence for that?
 
Back
Top Bottom