Therapeutic Use of Cannabis and Cannabinoids, 2025, Hsu et al.

Chandelier

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Therapeutic Use of Cannabis and Cannabinoids

Hsu, Michael; Shah, Arya; Jordan, Ayana; Gold, Mark S.; Hill, Kevin P.

Abstract​

Importance Approximately 27% of adults in the US and Canada report having ever used cannabis for medical purposes.
An estimated 10.5% of the US population reports using cannabidiol (CBD), a chemical compound extracted from cannabis that does not have psychoactive effects, for therapeutic purposes.

Observations Conditions for which cannabinoids have approval from the US Food and Drug Administration include HIV/AIDS–related anorexia, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, and certain pediatric seizure disorders.
A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials reported a small but significant reduction in nausea and vomiting from various causes (eg, chemotherapy, cancer) when comparing prescribed cannabinoids (eg, dronabinol, nabilone) with placebo or active comparators (eg, alizapride, chlorpromazine; standardized mean difference [SMD], −0.29 [95% CI, −0.39 to −0.18]).
A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials among patients with HIV/AIDS reported that cannabinoids had a moderate effect on increasing body weight compared with placebo (SMD, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.22 to 0.92]).
Evidence-based guidelines do not recommend the use of inhaled or high-potency cannabis (≥10% or 10 mg Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol [Δ9-THC]) for medical purposes.
High-potency cannabis compared with low-potency cannabis use is associated with increased risk of psychotic symptoms (12.4% vs 7.1%) and generalized anxiety disorder (19.1% vs 11.6%).
A meta-analysis of observational studies reported that 29% of individuals who used cannabis for medical purposes met criteria for cannabis use disorder.
Daily inhaled cannabis use compared with nondaily use was associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease (2.0% vs 0.9%), myocardial infarction (1.7% vs 1.3%), and stroke (2.6% vs 1.0%).
Evidence from randomized clinical trials does not support the use of cannabis or cannabinoids for most conditions for which it is promoted, such as acute pain and insomnia.
Before considering cannabis or cannabinoids for medical use, clinicians should consult applicable institutional, state, and national regulations; evaluate for drug-drug interactions; and assess for contraindications (eg, pregnancy) or conditions in which risks likely outweigh benefits (eg, schizophrenia or ischemic heart disease).
For patients using cannabis or cannabinoids for treatment of medical conditions, clinicians should discuss harm reduction strategies, including avoiding concurrent use with alcohol or other central nervous system depressants such as benzodiazepines, using the lowest effective dose, and avoiding use when driving or operating machinery.

Conclusions and Relevance Evidence is insufficient for the use of cannabis or cannabinoids for most medical indications. Clear guidance from clinicians is essential to support safe, evidence-based decision-making.
Clinicians should weigh benefits against risks when engaging patients in informed discussions about cannabis or cannabinoid use.

Web | DOI | JAMA
 
Evidence from randomized clinical trials does not support the use of cannabis or cannabinoids for most conditions for which it is promoted, such as acute pain and insomnia.
That's pretty funny considering how millions of people use it for both, and how much evidence clinical trials produce for junk treatments that almost no one uses on their own because they don't work for them. For me the difference in quality of life is enormous, and easily represents 2-3 more hours of sleep a night.

Especially when you look at medicine's so-called 'holistic' fetish, and the fact that one of the main consequences of cannabis legalization has been significant drops in addictive pain medication and alcohol. Now that is actual holistic, and not the, well, opposite with trying to pin everything on *checks notes* our mothers?!

I really don't know what medicine can do moving forward with how bad clinical evidence has become, but the fact that it's getting worse with time, to loud cheers, participation trophies and applause, only ever has one impact on me: can AIs take over all of this so we can have functioning health care systems already?
 
Back
Top Bottom