The impact of SARS-COV-2 infection on menstruation, 2023, Zhong et al.

Discussion in 'Long Covid research' started by SNT Gatchaman, Nov 17, 2023.

  1. SNT Gatchaman

    SNT Gatchaman Senior Member (Voting Rights) Staff Member

    Messages:
    6,724
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    The impact of SARS-COV-2 infection on menstruation
    Zhong, Xiaozhu; Lu, Keji; Liang, Weiying; Jihu, Luozi; Zeng, Anqi; Ding, Miao; Chen, Dongmei; Xie, Meiqing

    Recent study has demonstrated that the GnRH system in patients with post-COVID syndrome may be influenced by SARS-CoV-2. However, the impact of COVID-19 infection on women’s menstruation is still unknown.

    We aimed to investigate the the relationship between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and menstruation in premenopausal women. This was a retrospective cohort study. Pre-menopausal women were invited to participate in the online questionnaire on wechat. Participants were divided into four groups according to whether they were infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-COV-2) and whether they had menstrual changes during the pandemic. Sociodemographic characteristics, history of COVID-19, menstruation and menstrual changes of the participants were collected. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, version 25.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

    A total of 1946 women were included in the study. 1800 participants had been or were currently infected with SARS-COV-2, and 146 people had not been infected. Among 1800 patients with COVID-19, 666 (37.0%) had changes in menstruation, and 1134 (63.0%) did not, which was significantly higher than the uninfected participants (c2 = 12.161, P = 0.000). The proportion of participants with menstrual cycle changes (450/67.6%) is larger than that of uninfected participants (c2 = 6.904, P = 0.009). COVID-19 vaccination was associated with lower odds of menstrual cycle change (OR, 0.855; 95% CI, 0.750–0.976). Participants who reported chest pain (OR, 1.750, 95% CI, 1.209–2.533) and dyspnea (OR, 1.446; 95% CI, 1.052–1.988) during infection had greater odds of changes to their menstrual cycle compared with the participants who did not.

    The association between the COVID-19 and increased prevalence of menstrual cycle irregularity [is described]. COVID-19 vaccination is a protective factor in the long term, and participants with chest pain and dyspnea are more likely to develop AUB.

    Link | PDF (BMC Women's Health)
     
    Trish and Michelle like this.
  2. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    32,370
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Yeah, retrospective self-report, with self-selected recruitment. Number of people who had not been infected is relatively small, and so they might be different to the people who were infected - some sociodemographic difference that changes the incidence of menstrual changes.

    Same problem - could be some socio-demographic differences.

    Not ideal.
     
    Trish, Michelle and SNT Gatchaman like this.
  3. SNT Gatchaman

    SNT Gatchaman Senior Member (Voting Rights) Staff Member

    Messages:
    6,724
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    No.
     
    Hutan likes this.

Share This Page