Ravn
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Mostly an article by sports scientists exhorting us all – well, maybe not us specifically – to exercise more. However, the article mentions an interesting working hypothesis (no published papers on this that I could find, not looking very hard though). Bolding mine.
If we assume for a moment the hypothesis is correct, how would that fit in with 2-day CPET results where PwME typically have near normal VO2max on day 1 but significantly lowered VO2max on day 2? Surely we don't have a significant amount of blood going awol overnight?
https://theconversation.com/vo-max-the-gold-standard-for-measuring-fitness-explained-109486The logical question to ask is why VO₂max is so important for long-term health. This question has largely been ignored by researchers, and there are no clear answers. In our research, our working hypothesis is that VO₂max is a proxy for the amount of blood in the body. A greater volume of blood allows more oxygen to be transported to the muscles and so leads to a higher VO₂max.
If we assume for a moment the hypothesis is correct, how would that fit in with 2-day CPET results where PwME typically have near normal VO2max on day 1 but significantly lowered VO2max on day 2? Surely we don't have a significant amount of blood going awol overnight?