Protocol Respiratory biofeedback and psycho-education for patients with post COVID-19 symptoms and bodily distress […] POSITIV, 2025, Dinse, Kleinschnitz+

Discussion in 'Psychosomatic research - ME/CFS and Long Covid' started by SNT Gatchaman, Apr 27, 2025 at 3:20 AM.

  1. SNT Gatchaman

    SNT Gatchaman Senior Member (Voting Rights) Staff Member

    Messages:
    6,688
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Respiratory biofeedback and psycho-education for patients with post COVID-19 symptoms and bodily distress: study protocol of the randomized, controlled explorative intervention trial POSITIV
    Dinse, Hannah; Skoda, Eva-Maria; Schweda, Adam; Jansen, Christoph; Schmidt, Kira; Konik, Margarethe; Rohn, Hana; Witzke, Oliver; Stettner, Mark; Kleinschnitz, Christoph; Bäuerle, Alexander; Teufel, Martin

    A high number of individuals report suffering from physical and psychological sequelae symptoms after COVID-19—the so-called post COVID-19 condition. Commonly reported complaints include physical symptoms such as fatigue, headache, attention and concentration deficits or dyspnea and anxiety, symptoms of post-traumatic stress, or depression. Evidence-based treatment recommendations are still lacking up to this point. Associations between physical and psychological symptoms in chronic diseases are known for a long time. Support in coping with the disease and improvement of self-efficacy can have a positive effect on the course of diseases. For this reason, we designed a randomized, controlled explorative intervention trial as a treatment of bodily distress disorder in COVID-19 recovered persons.

    Patients with a post COVID-19 condition meeting to the criteria of the WHO, along with a bodily distress disorder, are randomized in an intervention and control arm (TAU). Randomization takes place after a diagnostic interview, screening, and informed consent. In total, 60 patients will be included in the trial (30 per group). The intervention group receives a cognitive behavioral therapy as a video-conference-based group therapy (6 weeks) and mobile, respiratory biofeedback treatment (for 4 weeks). At several time points, both groups are assessed in terms of psychological and physical health status, treatment expectation, and satisfaction with the intervention. Furthermore, they will get biofeedback examination appointments.

    The primary outcome is the change in self-efficacy; secondary outcomes include assessed parameters of mental health, somatic symptoms, and satisfaction with the intervention. Data will be analyzed primarily using R and SPSS. The randomized, controlled, explorative intervention trial POSITIV is one of the very first interventions for patients with post COVID-19 condition and psychological burden due to their different symptoms.

    The aim of the study is to generate new evidence and help patients to cope with the disease and thus, increase their quality of life and reduce symptomatology. We expect with a high probability that the patients’ self-efficacy and health status will improve as a result of the intervention.

    German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS); DRKS-ID: DRKS00030565. Registered on December 22, 2022.

    Link | PDF (Trials) [Open Access]
     
    Wyva and Turtle like this.
  2. SNT Gatchaman

    SNT Gatchaman Senior Member (Voting Rights) Staff Member

    Messages:
    6,688
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Unique, n. Being the only one of its kind. Unlike anything else.

    Totes the mostest and bestest equipoise.

    Using subjective questionnaires... in an unblinded study.

    "Objective".

    Nothing can go wrong there.
     
    alktipping, rvallee, Yann04 and 6 others like this.
  3. Utsikt

    Utsikt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,524
    Location:
    Norway
    They submitted the protocol in Dec 2023 after recruitment.

    From the last review Dec 2024:
    [​IMG]
     
    SNT Gatchaman and Yann04 like this.
  4. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    14,568
    Location:
    Canada
    This feels like it was written by a very junior intern. Maybe it comes off better in its original German, but the problem isn't grammar, it's the infantile notions behind. Looks completely unserious, and not surprising given Kleinschnitz. It's really awful that the medical profession is incapable of dealing with miscreants like this. It would be exactly like funding a prominent HIV denier for AIDS research.
    This is not a serious primary outcome.
    Yes, that's the problem. We know they expect that, despite there being zero reason to. Because this is corrupt pseudoscience, not research.
    This is not what objective means, and there is no amount of being lost in translation that can make up for that. This is like saying "I'm taking the stairs down to get to the roof".

    People talk a lot about late-stage capitalism, but late-stage medicine brain has the same problems, the same rot and induced misery simply to please a small number of extremists, and to protect stakeholders in industries that should have long ago ceased to exist, but have achieved regulatory capture.
     
    Sean, alktipping and SNT Gatchaman like this.

Share This Page