One single diagnosis, bodily distress syndrome, succeeded to capture 10 diagnostic categories of functional somatic syndromes... 2010 Fink & Schröder

Full title: One single diagnosis, bodily distress syndrome, succeeded to capture 10 diagnostic categories of functional somatic syndromes and somatoform disorders

Abstract

Background
In order to clarify the classification of physical complaints not attributable to verifiable, conventionally defined diseases, a new diagnosis of bodily distress syndrome was introduced. The aim of this study was to test if patients diagnosed with one of six different functional somatic syndromes or a DSM-IV somatoform disorder characterized by physical symptoms were captured by the new diagnosis.

Method
A stratified sample of 978 consecutive patients from neurological (n=120) and medical (n=157) departments and from primary care (n=701) was examined applying post-hoc diagnoses based on the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry diagnostic instrument. Diagnoses were assigned only to clinically relevant cases, i.e., patients with impairing illness.

Results
Bodily distress syndrome included all patients with fibromyalgia (n=58); chronic fatigue syndrome (n=54) and hyperventilation syndrome (n=49); 98% of those with irritable bowel syndrome (n=43); and at least 90% of patients with noncardiac chest pain (n=129), pain syndrome (n=130), or any somatoform disorder (n=178). The overall agreement of bodily distress syndrome with any of these diagnostic categories was 95% (95% CI 93.1–96.0; kappa 0.86, P<.0001). Symptom profiles of bodily distress syndrome organ subtypes were similar to those of the corresponding functional somatic syndromes with diagnostic agreement ranging from 90% to 95%.

Conclusion
Bodily distress syndrome seem to cover most of the relevant “somatoform” or “functional” syndromes presenting with physical symptoms, not explained by well-recognized medical illness, thereby offering a common ground for the understanding of functional somatic symptoms. This may help unifying research efforts across medical disciplines and facilitate delivery of evidence-based care.

Paywall, although introduction and 'snippets' are available.

 

Found the full paper on google: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/docum...&doi=fd3bb90b6abe9b86e9304350bdd62d2a3b4b9246

 

that analogy hits hard because that is exactly how they see us. Burdens who need to be dealt with as fast as efficiently as possible, anything else would be wasting time on people undeserving of it.

 

Confirmed: circular definition is indeed, as designed, circular. More at 11.

Who pays for this stuff? Oh, right, people who don't want to pay for sick people and would rather spend even more to produce worse outcomes for everyone.

 

In the case of Fink that is spot on.
https://melivet.com/2021/04/22/me-the-insurance-industry-and-psychiatry/