Sly Saint
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Have set this up on a thread on it's own (was previously on https://www.s4me.info/threads/mus-services-in-uk-and-other-mus-related-issues.8318/ )
University of Sheffield.
https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/scharr/sections/heds/mus/info
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=25520
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjd4KPU-dTgAhU6VxUIHW8pBp4QFjADegQIBhAC&url=https://njl-admin.nihr.ac.uk/document/download/2007338&usg=AOvVaw03jEe_b-20sZFMPNGgEu3A
I wrote to Joanna Leavis to ask a few questions.
It was treated as an FOI and had this reply:
estimated publication date of this study is now Nov 2019
University of Sheffield.
Funding details:
Funding: National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme (evidence synthesis)
Call: 14/26 Medically unexplained symptoms (MUS): primary care intervention
Start date: 01/09/2015 End date: 28/02/2017 (18 months)
Total Research costs: £200,007.67
Chief Investigator: Dr Joanna Leaviss
Organisation: ScHARR, University of Sheffield
https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/scharr/sections/heds/mus/info
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=25520
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjd4KPU-dTgAhU6VxUIHW8pBp4QFjADegQIBhAC&url=https://njl-admin.nihr.ac.uk/document/download/2007338&usg=AOvVaw03jEe_b-20sZFMPNGgEu3A
Doing a bit more digging on this systematic review done at Sheffield.
Coyne wrote a detailed blog about it in 2016
https://jcoynester.wordpress.com/20...rventions-for-medically-unexplained-symptoms/
it ends with this line
"Consumers and taxpayers are put at risk from biased evaluations of interventions which will undoubtedly affect health policy decisions."
It was discussed on PR (before my time)
https://forums.phoenixrising.me/threads/£208-000-of-taxpayers-money-for-a-group-incl-peter-white-rona-moss-morris-to-review-mus-evidence.39746/
I wrote to Joanna Leavis to ask a few questions.
It was treated as an FOI and had this reply:
I write in response to your request for information to Dr Joanna Leavis. As you are no doubt aware, all requests for information made to Public Authorities as defined in the Freedom of Information Act should be regarded as being made under the requirements of that Act, and so your request has been passed to me.
The University's responses to your questions follow:
RE:
14/26 Medically unexplained symptoms (MUS): primary care intervention: please could you tell me if this review has finished
(according to protocol it finished in 2017 but PROSPERO says the review is ongoing).
This study is on-going.
Have the results been published? If so, where.
No, but they will be published as an HTA monograph in due course
Could you also tell me which charities were represented in the Expert advisory group?.
This information will be included in the published study and is therefore exempt from disclosure at the current time under Section 22 of the Freedom of Information Act (information intended for future publication)..
I am required under the Act to inform you that if you have cause for genuine complaint regarding our reply to your request for information, you should within 60 days of receiving this response, write to the University FOI Unit, The University Secretary’s Office, Sheffield University, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN or email foi@sheffield.ac.uk explaining why you are not satisfied with the result.
If you still remain unsatisfied with the University's decision, you will be entitled to complain to the Information Commissioner, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire SK9 5AF.
Yours sincerely
Anne Cutler
The University Secretary’s Office
University of Sheffield
Western Bank
Sheffield
S10 2TN
estimated publication date of this study is now Nov 2019