@Tilly, I honestly do have an open mind on this, but I did not find the video convincing at all.
There's a discussion about ways to make a diagnosis. The doctor (Dempsey) says that a negative test means nothing, because mast cells release hundreds of chemicals and it might not be the tryptase or histamine that is the problem. Also that the chemicals degrade and so poor handling by the patient or the lab might affect a sample. Dempsey and Afrin apparently published about this.
So then there's response to treatment as a way of making a diagnosis. But, we know that the placebo effect could be resulting in people thinking they are better for a while. And, there was a lot of talk about how treatments seem to work for a while and then stop working. But, we know that that is also really consistent with a placebo effect. Dempsey said things like, take a rest from the medication and then come back to it later, some patients find that it will help again.
Dempsey said that patients who don't respond to anti-histamines can still have MCAS - they might be responding to one of the other hundreds of chemicals. So, it seems like there is no way to prove someone doesn't have MCAS. And that's a problem, because, unlike ME/CFS, which is just a statement that someone has the characteristic collection of symptoms. MCAS is a statement that people have a particular pathology.
Dempsey said that biopsy samples can be stained for mast cells (CD17), and that increased mast cell numbers can indicate MCAS. But, I suspect the number of MCAS cells can vary with the very particular tissue type, and I don't think more cells would necessarily mean the MCAS cells were doing something problematic.
Binita Kane says testing is very difficult in the UK, so she makes a clinical diagnosis and then sees if there is a response to medication.
Low dose naltrexone was mentioned. I remain skeptical of that while there is no good evidence for it.
It was commented that there is no right diet for everyone - very personalised. It didn't sound as though a low histamine diet was necessarily the answer, again because people might be reacting to any number of molecules.
At 30 mins, there was a question about mast cells and POTS and EDS. It was suggested that mast cells are affecting the autonomic nervous system causing POTS and are in the connective tissue, causing EDS.
Dempsey is making a film (is that the same one that Jen Brea announced that she was making on POTS, MCAS, EDS?). A pilot can be watched at mcasfund.org - sponsored by LDN Research Trust.
Edit - no, the films seems to be different, Jen Brea's one, covering much the same ground but also neurosurgery is said to be 'coming in 2026 (or 7)'.
Binita is really onboard with all of these ideas; she is treating patients along these lines.
There is talk of trauma and resetting the sympathetic system. I really can't see any evidence-based information here. It seems to be speculation presented as knowledge.
Tilly, perhaps you could tell us what makes you believe that MCAS is a useful diagnosis for the people you know?
(some typos corrected)