Identifying and renaming inaccurate, inappropriate or minimising words, phrases, etc. in ME/CFS

Utsikt said:
@bobbler I’m top foggy to keep track of everything at the moment, but I struggle to understand some of the perspectives here. It might be that I’ve misunderstood something.

Do you consider PEM to be ‘all symptoms someone with ME/CFS experience’ or is it something more restricted like ‘an increase in, and addition of, symptoms triggered by exertion, that are often, but not always, delayed’?

To me, it’s the latter. PEM isn’t ME/CFS, it’s a part of it.
Click to expand...
@Chestnut tree and @Kitty I think were replying to the point that if people are changing PEM to include 'non-delayed' then there needs to be a new word emphasising 'delayed-PEM' that I think @AliceLily describes.

It didn't help that I split the post for length in the end, and decided not to put the later ones as 'continued' on the same point - of it being replying to the implications of losing delayed PEM as a cardinal feature/aspect by fuzzying it out.


Because if we lose or fuzzy-out ourselves the clarity/concept that PEM is generally delayed (or lasts x time or involve x symptom) so we can't tell we have way overdone it and triggered PEM at the time, and seemed quite capable of eg lifting 20 heavy boxes because noone saw we were in bed for a week 24hrs later due to it (and that what came 24hrs later was much worse than what your colleague saw at the time when 'yes you seemed tired'), I think we need to consider the implications of that.

There are also implications if we think PEM is important for finding the mechanism in research, if we are not very very sure of what makes PEM PEM, rather than another issue. I think people used to emphasise the 'malaise' bit because it was like a reaction that happened in a delayed way, and that delay points to mechanism.

It's very hard because we all in reality have things layering on top of each other so if you are trying to describe what might be experienced at different points over a time period as a lived experience we might get the odd thing that hits us as PEM faster for certain reasons, and some fatiguability might feel like PEM. But is it a unique and useful phenomenon is an important question-mark?
 
Last edited:
@Hutan also made the interesting point a while back which I don't know whether it was resolved that do we define length of PEM as the length of certain symptoms ie what people count as the malaise or whatever is implicit in that - I've also just been talking about how long am I extremely debilitated and my life is ruled by that strange cycle of symptoms I know I will pass through (being awake but legs suddenly doing something distinctive like an overheated computer drive, joints going rheumaticky, then pass out sleep and can't move etc).

Or do we include how long it takes to somewhat recover from that / when all symptoms are 'raised'? - that 3 days then becomes at least a week before my sleep or function is anywhere near the norm is was before. Interfere with either in that mean time and all I will do is not only extend the PEM but put my body into a hell because trying sleep hygiene on me whilst my body is very much in the desperate need to recover and cycle back round phase and it could be use by some spy agency to drive someone over the edge as it is desperate in how it just prevents all rest and causes body to be in a state of exacerbation but that type where you need to rest in order to rest again, it is very precarious.

Who knows what proper recovery from that PEM would be if PEM was treated as a bout of serious illness and don't go back to soon etc.


It is important so that we aren't all talking at cross-purposes and undermining each other because we are talking about different bits when we describe impacts of things. Names and terms would be useful here for that, but I think also it could be helpful for what the cycle involved in PEM to actually be compared anyway to give insight in case it helps either patients or researchers.

If we are thinking about the discussion with @Trish of PEM being an episode because it is a whole washing cycle of parts that all complete as part of it (A typical washing machine cycle includes a wash stage, a rest period, a rinse, and a spin to remove water) but might have slightly different symptoms etc with them, but they all come in a similar order for us all at least then are these obvious enough we could give them terms?
 
Last edited:
@bobbler thank you for explaining.

My brain worm at the moment is that we don’t really know if whatever PEM turns out to be has to be delayed or if it just usually is delayed.

It could also be that there are two different mechanisms - one that produces delayed symptoms and one that produces instant symptoms.

I don’t believe we’re going to be able to hash out any concept that’s more limited than PEM without biomarkers.

But the possibility that there might be different concepts at play all at once means that any researchers have to track a lot of data and not just the 10 most common symptoms on a scale from 1 to 10 or just fatigue or whatever.

Ideally, we would put people in a care facility with all kinds of monitoring for weeks or months and have them do different tests. But that’s just a fantasy!
 
It is interesting to read all the different comments and to consider how potentially complex the entire issue is. It is important we have these discussions. But I feel at present in such as the fact sheets we need to focus on what makes PEM unique and not worry too much about the subtler aspects.

Once we have a clear cut definition of obvious PEM hopefully we will establish physiological markers that in turn will make exploring the grey areas around the edges more practicable. Just as at present ME/CFS is only in theory first diagnosed when activity levels are down at least 50% of premorbid functioning, even though this is an arbitrary line which probably has no basis in reality, I think we should only be using the term PEM where it can be clearly distinguished from the general fatigue issues and other post exertion effects seen in other conditions, even if this leaves large grey areas.
 
Peter Trewhitt said:
I think we should only be using the term PEM where it can be clearly distinguished from the general fatigue issues and other post exertion effects seen in other conditions, even if this leaves large grey areas.
Click to expand...
I agree.

I still don’t like the post-exertional malaise name because it implies causation and it’s not just malaise. But that’s a different issue.
 
bobbler said:
It is tricky because of rolling PEM (but then I eventually crash on that as it piles up and I'm trying to get 'enough rest to do that one essential thing like the loo' or when more well 'enough rest at the weekend to just keep my job the next week but not enough to stop it piling and carrying over as we do so). and with that the issue that most (I suspect) pwme hardly get out of PEM.
Click to expand...
Yes, there is so much to reply to in your posts @bobbler and I am not going to be able to do that but the layering factor is is constantly happening in the severe levels. I call rolling PEM and gets nastier with delayed.
 
Last edited:
Clarification on my comment;

To me PEM has always been ‘ a worsening of symptoms’ that sometimes has a delayed effect. So direct and delayed effect.

Now it seems we are redefining PEM as only or mostly delayed PEM.

So what are the direct effects after stimuli and exertion? To me it is definitely not normal fatigue or fatigue ability .

In my healthy life I was fatigued often I had a demanding job and a very active lifestyle with a lot of exercise. That fatigue never led to the direct effects I now have after very minimal exertion.

There is also a risk of calling direct effects after exertion fatigue of fatiguability, because it would not take into consideration that you could worsen from those small exertions.

In my view you can both worsen from direct exertions as from delayed PEM. And that would not be clear if you call direct effects normal fatigue.

Hope I have explained myself a bit better now.
 
Vocabulary that I would like to change
The vague terms:
- fatigue/tired have already been mentioned
- brain fog, as if I have some kind of mist in my brain. I would prefer terms that are more descriptive such as difficulty finding words, difficulty remembering, etc
- flu-like feeling, also vague and a lot of people diminish flu these days ‘oh, it is just a flu, so maybe describe what it is, for instance feeling feverish, a sore throat, etc
- malaise but I do not know a better alternative for it
 
Last edited:
To me, the worsening of some symptoms with any exertion that necessitates rest breaks, and I can do about the same amount on following days is what ME/CFS is all the time. It doesn't make ME/CFS different from other chronic conditions that have symptom increases over the day, which may be pain, fatigue, breathlessness etc. depending on the condition.

The thing that seems to differentiate ME/CFS from most other conditions is the episodes when we are much sicker and less able to function than usual. I think that needs a name and that name is PEM. It's sort of equivalent to a migraine or an asthma attack. It stops us doing what we can usually do.
Definitions of PEM by the US IOM and UK NICE both describe it in that episodic way, at least that's how I understand them.
 
I agree with @Trish here.

Although I believe PEM can be pretty instant on some occasions, even though that seems to be much less common. I would only call it PEM if it matches the symptom patterns of your regular delayed PEM.

And it shouldn’t be confused with hypersensitivities etc., unless those end up causing PEM (like how many more severe experience).
 
@Chestnut tree I don’t think I am disagreeing with your meaning, but I think it is important we are clear in distinguishing PEM from other post exertion effects. Worsening of symptoms after exertion happens in other conditions, but generally rest results in pretty rapid improvement. PEM is a distinct response to exertion or over stimulation that has its own distinct course and pattern. With delayed PEM this difference is much easier to recognise.

It is unfortunate that we currently only have a set of confusing and ambiguous terms. However at present I suspect we are stuck with using lay terms as an ME/CFS technical vocabulary, and all we can do is make it clear when we are using jargon words with a specific meaning.
 
I've never been a fan of the phrase "ME patient", as it implies the provision of treatment or services by a healthcare provider. "ME sufferer" is about the best alternative I can come up with. Healthcare providers can call us "patients" once they start offering something useful, but as long as there are ME sufferers who would rather get worse or die before going to hospital (and quite a few have chosen to die rather than experience hospital "care" again), I think calling us "patients" is a bit of a presumption. Not even sure they should be using the word "care" in the context of ME either.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom