Karen Kirke
Established Member (Voting Rights)
The ME Association has posted a blog today on the GETSET letters published in the Lancet last week: http://www.meassociation.org.uk/201...nd-a-response-from-the-authors-26-march-2018/
Handily, it includes the full text of each of the five letters (at the end), the full text of the authors' response (the middle), and a summary of MEA's critique of GETSET (the beginning).
The letters are by
Karen D Kirke (me)
Joan Crawford
Robert H Saunders
Frank Twisk
Anna Wood
See also this thread: https://www.s4me.info/threads/getset-letters-in-the-lancet.3139/#post-55915
Moderators: The official title of these letters is "Graded exercise self-help for chronic fatigue syndrome in GETSET". Should we change these two thread titles to reflect that? Or is it best to keep the GETSET acronym prominent?
Handily, it includes the full text of each of the five letters (at the end), the full text of the authors' response (the middle), and a summary of MEA's critique of GETSET (the beginning).
The letters are by
Karen D Kirke (me)
Joan Crawford
Robert H Saunders
Frank Twisk
Anna Wood
See also this thread: https://www.s4me.info/threads/getset-letters-in-the-lancet.3139/#post-55915
Moderators: The official title of these letters is "Graded exercise self-help for chronic fatigue syndrome in GETSET". Should we change these two thread titles to reflect that? Or is it best to keep the GETSET acronym prominent?