Exercise/physical activity and health outcomes: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews, 2020, Posadzki et al

Discussion in 'Other health news and research' started by Midnattsol, May 16, 2025 at 10:24 AM.

  1. Midnattsol

    Midnattsol Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    4,019
    Abstract
    Background
    Sedentary lifestyle is a major risk factor for noncommunicable diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer and diabetes. It has been estimated that approximately 3.2 million deaths each year are attributable to insufficient levels of physical activity. We evaluated the available evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews (CSRs) on the effectiveness of exercise/physical activity for various health outcomes.

    Methods
    Overview and meta-analysis. The Cochrane Library was searched from 01.01.2000 to issue 1, 2019. No language restrictions were imposed. Only CSRs of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Both healthy individuals, those at risk of a disease, and medically compromised patients of any age and gender were eligible. We evaluated any type of exercise or physical activity interventions; against any types of controls; and measuring any type of health-related outcome measures. The AMSTAR-2 tool for assessing the methodological quality of the included studies was utilised.

    Results
    Hundred and fifty CSRs met the inclusion criteria. There were 54 different conditions. Majority of CSRs were of high methodological quality. Hundred and thirty CSRs employed meta-analytic techniques and 20 did not. Limitations for studies were the most common reasons for downgrading the quality of the evidence. Based on 10 CSRs and 187 RCTs with 27,671 participants, there was a 13% reduction in mortality rates risk ratio (RR) 0.87 [95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.78 to 0.96]; I2 = 26.6%, [prediction interval (PI) 0.70, 1.07], median effect size (MES) = 0.93 [interquartile range (IQR) 0.81, 1.00]. Data from 15 CSRs and 408 RCTs with 32,984 participants showed a small improvement in quality of life (QOL) standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.18 [95% CI 0.08, 0.28]; I2 = 74.3%; PI -0.18, 0.53], MES = 0.20 [IQR 0.07, 0.39]. Subgroup analyses by the type of condition showed that the magnitude of effect size was the largest among patients with mental health conditions.

    Conclusion
    There is a plethora of CSRs evaluating the effectiveness of physical activity/exercise. The evidence suggests that physical activity/exercise reduces mortality rates and improves QOL with minimal or no safety concerns.

    Trial registration
    Registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019120295) on 10th January 2019.

    LINK
     
    Wyva and Deanne NZ like this.
  2. Midnattsol

    Midnattsol Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    4,019
    Posted as they write in the conclusion that exercise comes with "minimal or no safety concerns", but the data on adverse events and withdrawal from studies doesn't look so good:

    CSR: Cochrane systematic review

    Adverse events
    Withdrawal
     
  3. Utsikt

    Utsikt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,969
    Location:
    Norway
    Supplementary table 6 and 7 shows that most of the studies in the reviews suffered from serious issues with bias. And that’s from what I assume are flawed bias assessments. The bias is probably even worse.

    So I don’t understand how they can conclude that there is evidence for efficacy.
     
    alktipping, MEMarge, MeSci and 4 others like this.
  4. Creekside

    Creekside Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,556
    People who managed to exercise in the study weren't dead yet? All the dead subjects weren't exercising. Proof of efficiency!
     
    Midnattsol, alktipping and MEMarge like this.
  5. Adrian

    Adrian Administrator Staff Member

    Messages:
    7,025
    Location:
    UK
    They should have recruited some zombies so dead subjects could exercise.
     
    Midnattsol, alktipping and Trish like this.

Share This Page