Page 12 of the APPG report Rethinking ME states:
Is this true? If so, to what degree? And over what period? I'd be grateful if anyone could let me have the evidence.
There is no citation for this statement in the report. A previous sentence within the paragraph (stating that recovery is rare) cited a systematic review by Cairns and Hotopf who found a median proportion of 39% (range 8-63%) improved without intervention on follow up (and they recommend GET and CBT). Return to work ranged 8 to 30%. Put another way, a median of 61% (range 37-72%) showed no improvement and 70 to 92% could not return to work.
This paragraph seems contradictory.
Most people will experience a degree of improvement over time and then stabilise at a lower level of functioning than before the onset of their illness.
Is this true? If so, to what degree? And over what period? I'd be grateful if anyone could let me have the evidence.
There is no citation for this statement in the report. A previous sentence within the paragraph (stating that recovery is rare) cited a systematic review by Cairns and Hotopf who found a median proportion of 39% (range 8-63%) improved without intervention on follow up (and they recommend GET and CBT). Return to work ranged 8 to 30%. Put another way, a median of 61% (range 37-72%) showed no improvement and 70 to 92% could not return to work.
This paragraph seems contradictory.