Associations between symptoms and functional capacity in patients after COVID-19 infection and community controls, 2023, Huynh et al.

SNT Gatchaman

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Staff member
Associations between symptoms and functional capacity in patients after COVID-19 infection and community controls
Quan Huynh; Noah Wexler; Joel Smith; Leah Wright; Felicia Ho; Richard Allwood; Yusuke Sata; Stefano Manca; Erin Howden; Thomas H. Marwick

Background: Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC or ‘long COVID’) reflect ongoing symptoms, but these are non-specific and common in the wider community. Few reports of PASC have been compared with a control group.

Aims: To compare symptoms and objective impairment of functional capacity in patients with previous COVID-19 infection with uninfected community controls. Methods: In this community-based, cross-sectional study of functional capacity, 562 patients from Western Melbourne who had recovered from COVID-19 infections in 2021 and 2022 were compared with controls from the same community and tested for functional capacity pre-COVID-19. Functional impairment (<85% of the predicted response) was assessed using the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and 6-min walk distance (6MWD) test. A subgroup underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing before and after exercise training.

Results: Of 562 respondents (age 54 ± 12 years, 69% women), 389 were symptomatic. Functional impairment (<85% predicted metabolic equivalent of tasks) was docu- mented by DASI in 149 participants (27%), and abnormal 6MWD (<85% predicted) was observed in 14% of the symptomatic participants. Despite fewer risk factors and younger age, patients with COVID-19 had lower functional capacity by 6MWD (P < 0.001) and more depression (P < 0.001) than controls. In a pilot group of seven participants (age 58 ± 12 years, two women, VO2 18.9 ± 5.7 mL/kg/min), repeat testing after exercise training showed a 20% increase in peak workload.

Conclusions: Although most participants (69%) had symptoms consistent with long COVID, significant subjective functional impairment was documented in 27% and objective functional impairment in 14%. An exercise training programme might be beneficial for appropriately selected patients.

Link | PDF (Internal Medicine Journal)
 
Conclusion —

The results of this study show impairment of both objective and subjective functional capacity in a proportion of people infected with COVID-19 which appeared to be exacerbated in those with long COVID, suggesting that physical deconditioning – presumably because of weeks or months of inactivity – may be causative in some. The high prevalence of depression that was associated with COVID-19 and long COVID was a concern that might need public health intervention. Future longitudinal studies are required to determine the causal relationship between long COVID and these adverse outcomes.

Clinical Implications —

The standard approach to long-COVID symptoms has been the provision of supportive care. Although limited preliminary data support the notion that exercise training may improve functional capacity and reduce symptoms, there is no consensus as to the benefits of this in this setting. Caution needs to be applied to patient selection, as there is an overlap between long COVID and chronic fatigue syndrome, and exercise may be detrimental in the latter [ref NICE 2021]. Nonetheless, a randomised trial to test the efficacy of exercise in appropriately selected patients seems warranted.

No mention in the text of post-exertional malaise or symptom exacerbation.
 
They do repeat CPET tests (in a tiny sample, but still), and find the 20% decrease in workload capacity that is so often found in ME/CFS. And then they fall back onto 'let's exercise them out of this'. How much reinvention of the wheel has to happen before people realise it doesn't work.

And, a 6 minute walk test? For mild LC ME/CFS, one session of 6 minutes of brisk walking is entirely possible. It's not going to tell them much.

Most researchers are associated with the Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute.
Looks like they are currently recruiting for a study on PEM in ME/CFS.
https://baker.edu.au/research/clinical-trials/parsing-pem-study

Clearly they need to engage with patients a lot more.
 
Most researchers are associated with the Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute.
Looks like they are currently recruiting for a study on PEM in ME/CFS.
https://baker.edu.au/research/clinical-trials/parsing-pem-study

Clearly they need to engage with patients a lot more.

Some S4ME threads on Baker Institute studies:

PERCEIVE study (GET for Long Covid): Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Australia

PARsing PEM: does post-exertional autonomic recovery (PAR) impact post-exertional malaise?
 
Back
Top Bottom