Hoopoe
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
I have access to my own raw data and am looking through it slowly.
One of the interesting findings so far is a series of mutations in the HLA-DQB1 gene, and one in the HLA-DRB1 gene which are all associated with increased risk for multiple sclerosis.
PS: also many variants in HLA-DQA1.
I also have one of the IDO2 variants reported by Phair as potentially damaging (which is very common in the general population, so it doesn't really mean anything), and one that is a missense variant not reported by him.
				
			One of the interesting findings so far is a series of mutations in the HLA-DQB1 gene, and one in the HLA-DRB1 gene which are all associated with increased risk for multiple sclerosis.
PS: also many variants in HLA-DQA1.
I also have one of the IDO2 variants reported by Phair as potentially damaging (which is very common in the general population, so it doesn't really mean anything), and one that is a missense variant not reported by him.
			
				Last edited: 
			
		
	
								
								
									
	
								
							
							 
	 
 
		 . Here the software highlights 17 of them as being of possible interest. None of these are probably doing anything significant. The HLA genes seem to be the among worst in terms of sheer number of mutations.
. Here the software highlights 17 of them as being of possible interest. None of these are probably doing anything significant. The HLA genes seem to be the among worst in terms of sheer number of mutations. 
