24 April Tuller - Trial By Error: Andrew Lloyd’s Past Endorsement of PACE

Preview
This post is sort of long and complicated, but I think the details are important given Andrew Lloyd’s outsized role in the ME/CFS domain in Australia. I urge patients to take care not to over-exert themselves in reading it!

**********

A few weeks ago, I interviewed Andrew Lloyd, an infectious disease specialist at the University of New South Wales. When I asked about his past referencing of the PACE trial as evidence for treating ME/CFS with CBT and GET, he told me he “might have” cited it in papers but couldn’t actually remember whether he had or not. He further declared himself “unfussed” about the controversy over the trial because other evidence (e.g. the Cochrane reviews) also found that these therapies were effective. (More on that problematic argument in another post.)

In my short blog about our conversation, I indicated that I found it hard to believe Professor Lloyd couldn’t remember whether or not he’d cited PACE. Here’s one reason: In 2015, he co-wrote a BMJ editorial that discussed three separate PACE papers. Here’s another: Three years before that, he co-authored a commentary in the Journal of Internal Medicine that not only mentioned the PACE findings favorably but unfairly criticized smart patients and researchers who had questioned the reported results.
More at link in original post.
 
When assessing the Australian situation, don't let Prof. Ian Hickie off the hook. He has flown under the accountability radar very successfully, but his influence and culpability from the early 1990s on, both in Australia and internationally, are substantial.

For a start, he was a co-author on the Fukuda 1994 criteria, and is big on somatisation, including conjuring up a checklist to assess it, known as SPHERE (Somatic and Psychological HEalth REport).

I don't know for a fact, but I also strongly suspect that he had a major hand in the very controversial draft Australian clinical guidelines issued in 1997 (with the final version coming out in 2003). The draft was basically just the views of the UK branch of the BPS club. It was truly atrocious, and fired up patient anger here big time.
 
Back
Top Bottom