“6 Common Flaws To Look Out For in Peer Review”

[Dolphin]

https://publons.com/blog/6-common-research-flaws-to-watch-out-for-in-peer-review/

 

[rvallee]

1) Inappropriate study design for the study aims
2) Deviating from standard/best practice and methodologies
3) Over-interpretation of results
4) Commenting beyond the scope of the article
5) Lack of evidence to support conclusions
6) Too many words

PACE and the ME-BPS ideology are the Platonic ideal of those flaws in pure concentrated essence. Somehow they are considered good science despite exceeding all those flaws. Something's clearly systemically wrong then.