How the Lancet lost our trust Stuart Ritchie The Spectator (UK) 26/06/2021
A few of us have tried to get Ritchie interested in the PACE trial, but he has previously refused. But since it now seems to support his argument, he does cautiously mention it...
bad science
blinding
breastfeeding
coi
conflicts of interest
confounding
correction
depression
elisabeth bik
fraud
gaming
lancet
meta-analysis
methodology
observational study
pace trial
reporting
retraction watch
ritchie
science writing
stuart ritchie
the spectator
Treatment outcome in adults with chronic fatigue syndrome: a prospective study in England based on the CFS/ME National Outcomes Database
E Crawley, S M Collin, P D White, K Rimes, J A C Sterne, M T May CFS/ME National Outcomes Database
(originally published 2013)...
A correction has appeared in BMJ Open for a UK/Dutch study published in 2015.
Esther Crawley was one of the original studies authors.
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/11/e008830corr1
The original 2015 study:
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/10/e008830
BMJ has "corrected" the Lightning Process study but has allowed its conclusions to stand, as far as I can tell. I will have more to say about this. Apparently, the authors have convinced the journal that the outcome swapping had nothing to do with the fact that the revised primary outcome had...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.