correction

  1. J

    Stuart Ritchie, science journalist, articles on science fraud and open science

    How the Lancet lost our trust Stuart Ritchie The Spectator (UK) 26/06/2021 A few of us have tried to get Ritchie interested in the PACE trial, but he has previously refused. But since it now seems to support his argument, he does cautiously mention it...
  2. Sly Saint

    Corrected proof: Treatment outcome in adults with CFS: a prospective study in England, CFS/ME National Outcomes Database, 2013, 2020, Crawley,White

    Treatment outcome in adults with chronic fatigue syndrome: a prospective study in England based on the CFS/ME National Outcomes Database E Crawley, S M Collin, P D White, K Rimes, J A C Sterne, M T May CFS/ME National Outcomes Database (originally published 2013)...
  3. John Mac

    Correction: CFS/ME is different in children compared to in adults: a study of UK and Dutch clinical cohorts. 2019

    A correction has appeared in BMJ Open for a UK/Dutch study published in 2015. Esther Crawley was one of the original studies authors. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/11/e008830corr1 The original 2015 study: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/10/e008830
  4. Kalliope

    BMJ Archives of Diseases in Childhood: ''Editor’s note on correction to Crawley et al. (2018)'', 2019, Nick Brown. (SMILE LP Trial)

    BMJ has "corrected" the Lightning Process study but has allowed its conclusions to stand, as far as I can tell. I will have more to say about this. Apparently, the authors have convinced the journal that the outcome swapping had nothing to do with the fact that the revised primary outcome had...
Back
Top Bottom