Search results

  1. AR561

    Positive signs for FND: Looking for Criticism

    We can agree to disagree. His entire page, posts, and discussions (Kjetil's) do have compelling evidence/rationale and it's also a field that's being expanded on: not finished as science is a method/process. Proof gaming doesn't work when large amounts of time, grant funding, and effort are...
  2. AR561

    Positive signs for FND: Looking for Criticism

    Some of the FND articles I saw also mention they don’t know the loop of causality: do mental symptoms come first or after the patient’s perception of physical symptoms? They also assume that in practice neurologists will realize that their version of FND can exist alongside other neurological...
  3. AR561

    Positive signs for FND: Looking for Criticism

    There’s also this article that mentions somatoform conditions and the limitations to technology: The Involvement of Secondary Neuronal Damage in the Development of Neuropsychiatric Disorders Following Brain Insults https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3949352/ “However, 40% of...
  4. AR561

    Positive signs for FND: Looking for Criticism

    I’ll be responding with a few comments. I apologize if I’m all over the place. Insomnia and brain fog. Thank you for your response. I wanted to add that one of the biggest issues with FND is despite the “positive” signs they consider to be rule-ins, this entire category of psychosomatic...
  5. AR561

    Positive signs for FND: Looking for Criticism

    Hello. I am new to here and have an interest in critiques of Functional Neurological Disorder. I knew that three "positive" rule-in signs were tremor entrapments, Hoover's sign, and psychogenic seizures, but I also found a table that listed positive signs you will see in the table linked below...
Back
Top Bottom