Going on 2 and a half months, I think it is clear the authors and the editor (who presumably would insist on the changes suggested by her predecessor) do not agree.
It's notable that none of the references to "boom-bust" or "overactivity–underactivity cycling" involve CFS patients. The reference to "Effects of activity pacing in patients with chronic conditions associated with fatigue complaints: A meta‐analysis" only mentions a narative review of Exercise...
It could be an indirect measure of motivation during exercise testing, I wonder if an increase (eg more effort from baseline) in Borg score at 52 weeks is associated with an increase in 6MWD at 52 weeks?
There is a review in Psychology Today that summarises it.
There is also a review here (and extra followup on the blog):
https://holeousia.com/2019/05/24/a-review-the-medical-model-in-mental-health/
https://holeousia.com/2019/06/12/alienists/
The Borg scale is a relative scale which patients rate intensity of effort during an exercise test. It is meaningless to compare scores between patients, or between exercise tests for the same patient if the gap is more than about a day.
Participants rating lower peak Borg scores doesn't...
Your personal experience? :p
The underlying problem is that they did not provide what they said they would provide in the protocol. Even if they sufficiently justified the change in the manuscript (they didn't), I don't think the manuscript should have passed peer review without at least...
The logical conclusion is that a score of 4 or more on the Chalder Fatigue Scale is not a specific predictor of CFS. (Note that Chalder reported the cutoff score of 3 or less as indicative of "normal" fatigue using bimodal scoring, not Likert scoring.)
Anyone who has actually looked at the...
I guess we'll have to assume that IRB had granted ethics approval?
I'm not sure how the stair climbing test and six minute walking test are relevant to those groups of patients.
The young man pictured is of course a stock photo. The testimonial doesn't sound quite like anything anyone I know (or on ME forums) would write, it seems edited to sound more favourable at the very least).
Mentions this study from 1995 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8542261 (Costa et al.)...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.