Gerada, et al, wouldn't be catastrophising, would they? Surely not.
I mean if intelligent, highly educated and resourced and privileged professionals are having trouble coping, imagine what it is like for the ungrateful peasants patients they treat.
Exactly. They want blanket immunity because...
I think we can go further now and state that the deconditioning hypothesis has been refuted and simply is not relevant.
These questionnaires don't allow us to distinguish between patients' interpretation/perception of their symptoms, and their reporting of their interpretation/perception...
People feel better when doing things they enjoy doing. Who knew?
The project to confabulate pacing with GET continues.
And still obsessed with the exercise is always good trope.
How about the problem with the whole IAPT project is less the implementation and more the underlying assumptions and content, or lack of it?
Maybe a lot of this stuff is just irrelevant at best, and trying to force round pegs into square holes is never going to work?
Ever considered that, guys?
"What of the researchers braving this often toxic academic terrain?"
If they do their job competently and honestly, they will not have a problem. And vice-versa.
FFS, it is not difficult to grasp this. If you pervert and abuse the scientific process, smear and malign your critics, and harm...
I don't doubt there are psychosocial factors that contribute to poor health, physical and mental.
Including misdiagnosis and mistreatment by perverse applications of the psychosocial paradigm.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.