Search results

rhetorical juju :D

The cognitive-linguistic gymnastics these clowns will indulge in just to avoid simply saying 'I don't know', never ceases to amaze me.

Three independent teams, using three different methods, with the same result. Given the methodologies are sound (including statistical power), then this is looking like the best possibility so far for both a specific and unique (?) biomarker, and a leading research clue. :thumbup::)

Woo goo.

I strongly encourage Jerome Burne to read the full document linked to by Sharpe, and find out exactly what it really said about PACE and its methodology. Sharpe is relying on people not reading it in full, nor following up on the full context...

That would be Kimberley Goldsmith.

And all it took was combining uncontrolled subjective measures, with deliberately maximising known biases in those subjective measures, and no reference to the real world. Who knew? :rolleyes:

Moving into the cash grab phase.

Oh noes! These doctors might actually have to do some hard work and find a real explanation and treatment, and give up their easy lucrative patient-blaming psycho-drama fairy-tales. Poor widdle darlings. We hurtses their feeling-poos. And incomes.

And, by complete coincidence I am sure, that also makes for plenty of work and income for the chronic stress therapists. There it is, the dead end these arse-clowns always retreat to – the morality-play 'explanation'. Because they got nothing else, certainly no hard science. If any single...

Nice work, sir. :thumbup:

The only example they could come up with was employers? No partner, family, friends, local community,...? This sales pitch isn't aimed at patients. I look forward to them introducing, using and reporting properly, and accepting the results of a robust program of outcomes measurement. Outcome...

This. When you have no explanation, but really really need one, at the most basic practical survival level, your imagination takes off in the search for a causal pattern. Some interpret this as pathological deviance. They are wrong. It is the only sane option in the circumstances. It also...

Part 1 done. Part 2 next payday (18th). :thumbup:

Thanks to all those reporting the conference. :thumbup: Not to mention careers, empires, egos, status, and – let's not be too polite – well above average incomes. Who the fuq still uses Flash in 2019?

Is that the same talk as this one?

This.

Sheesh, some people forgot to read The Memo. :rolleyes: I mean, how are we going to keep reinforcing the BPS narrative about us being rabid oppressive anti-science activists if we are going to recognise and praise high quality science like this, and fully accept its results, even if negative...

Clearly you are in denial and have selectively edited your memories. :bag:

Until the money is in the bank, it is a promise.