That's how I'm interpreting this aswell. AYME and AFME merger was out of necessity and I'm sure this one is aswell. They're steadily losing backing, which is great for us.
That alone can't be it. In the past stuff like this would never get past the editors. So not only was there an open minded reporter, but there must've been a couple of open minded editors too. Which is much more of a change.
Who doesn't enjoy a good bout of being stuffed up followed by a bout of pissing out your arse. For a lot of people that's just christmas i.e. the happiest time of the year.
I don't know enough about these Aussie researchers to make any claim about them, but in the recent past there was some anger about the NIH funding 3 research centers over the OMF's team which is what Andy and I were both hinting at if i'm correct about Andy. And while the OMF do look very good...
I think that was kind off the point. OMF has got a good team, a great team even. But so do others, and ideally we would fund them all instead of getting angry when one of those other teams get picked over the OMF.
It's bullshit idd. I've played football twice or three times a week when my illness really started to take it's toll, alongside 2/3 times fitness and at a certain point even kickboxing to raise my stamina. Pretty ******* far from fearing exercise.
I got that, but something about it rubbed me the wrong way. I don't like to see even the vaguest link towards the skechy behaviour of the PACE "scientists", when it comes to good and thorough biomedical research.
Not sure I agree here. If you meet them at their venues with a host sympathetic to them, sure they're gonna come off as the "winners". They however didn't know how fast to get rid of Tuller, before he pointed out the plethora of faults in their work. With an unpartial moderator and faced with...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.