Search results

Hey Esther12--that specific commentary did not come up but we did talk about his citing of PACE in his work and his attitude toward PACE and related studies. I will report on this later on.

well I had actually thought about that myself!

Ha! The university picks the dates. It doesn't really matter if people see it or if others jump in. I'm just not going to post on Facebook or Virology Blog or Twitter until the first.

good idea. I can't see where to edit the title...

The soft launch has started. The hard launch is on April 1st--that's when Berkeley formally announces all the campaigns. We're supposed to generate some interest by discretely sharing out links without posting it all over the universe yet. So here's mine...

I think now that the groundwork is there, other press coverage would help. Either by me or by others. I am trying to figure that one out now. Maximum public embarrassment is the only thing that will work.

Peter, I don't know. You only have to read the school absence paper to see it's not service evaluation. In the open peer review, a BPS colleague raised serious questions about the lack of ethical review. Crawley gave absurd non-answers, which I pointed out in my first post about the issue. The...

No, but I'm gay, and I think both Denzel and Idris are very sexy.

I'm going for either Denzel Washington or Idris Elba to play me.

I am sure Ponting's response was not what SMC wanted to see. It demolishes the Stone statement and the absurd response from Sharpe et al. And why didn't they ask my BFF Esther Crawley to comment? Surely she would have given them a slam-dunk statement that despite any criticism, PACE remains a...

I am working on this issue...and doing some lobbying. I have a meeting with someone from the agency that administers NDIS tomorrow.

Actually hopefully there will be something in Lismore.

Actually, I should retract that about the Peter principle. It does imply that she has been competent to date.

Crawley's apparent promotion is clearly the Peter Principle at work.

Looking at what they did and at that statement by Chalder, it is clear that they manipulated what they said to exaggerate the claims. Given that Chalder has never publicly, as far as I have seen, explained or retracted that comment, it is fair to hold her to it. They colluded with each other and...

whether I meant "other" or "wrong," the main point is that Australians themselves should not want me driving there!! I am happy to leave any driving to them.

To my friend Professor Edwards' points--I have to look at the hours again, but it's now 9:35 am Monday morning in SF and 3:35 am Tuesday morning in Melbourne. And we just moved ourselves forward an hour this past weekend, so I'm confused about the time shift. Why isn't that 18 hours ahead? Do we...

Interesting. I do not think this BMJ Open decision will be the last we hear about this issue.

Well, and the 2016 highlight was really Alem Matthees' victory at the First-Tier Tribunal, which of course was what led to the reanalyses that she does highlight.

I hope people at Bristol have started to realize that she is becoming a liability. Universities don't usually like their faculty members to falsely accuse faculty at other well-known institutions of being libelous--not to mention in their inaugural addresses. They usually don't like their...