Search results

Can you link the post you're referring to please, so we can see the context.

The election is only 6 weeks away, so there will be a new crop of MP's the day after the election. Realistically, with the summer recess in July and August and party conferences in September, we're unlikely to see APPG's re starting until at least October, I suspect. As for the delivery plan...

I have just been reminding myself of FUNCAP. Here's our thread about it: https://www.s4me.info/threads/assessing-functional-capacity-in-me-cfs-a-patient-informed-questionnaire-2023-sommerfelt-et-al.35464/page-3 And here's a link to try it yourself: https://raffbenato.github.io/funcap55/ It's...

Some posts have been moved to: USA: Senate NIH appropriations hearing May 23, 2024

How incredibly dehumanising and patronising. How is this even allowed in these days of full access to our medical records. I will never fill in a questionnaire that goes in my medical records in future. Trust the expert, they know more about your health from a few answers to inadequate...

So basically, as I understand it, a decision was made not to withdraw the 2019 review some time in 2020/1 behind closed doors and with no public statement saying such a decision had been reached or the reasons for it. And further, any other requests to withdraw the review, even on new grounds...

No apology has been received from Sarah Tyson, and the MEA in the person of its chair of Trustees, Neil Riley, merely says our complaint about Sarah Tyson's post is 'noted' and they have full confidence in her. See their letter, a copy of which is posted in the letters thread...

I think either is fine. I agree it's good to keep a record and to note an action taken.

Many of them are posted on regional news threads, since, as you say, they don't warrant their own thread.

It was mentioned in the radio program. It's the NHS hospital in Scotland that does alt med like homeopathy.

Surely the abstract should highlight the huge drop out rate, which make the claims of success nonsense.

I think you're right, @Hutan, basically people will take from that program what they want to hear. People with Long Covid desperate to get better will latch onto that story of getting instantly better and think it must be worth a try. When I listened to her I heard someone who had only been sick...

I haven't tried the module but I have looked through the article which outlines what's in the module. My main comment is there's too much on possible causes, all unproven, and nothing as far as I can see about very severe ME/CFS. The general impression is of mild ME/CFS.

This has been raised before. I have no idea why he repeats this idea.

That reads like a bad joke. And if we want to appeal the editor in chief is on the appeals panel. So bad luck if your complaint is about the editor in chief.

You're right, but any of us with long term worsening can't see into the future. Some people with very severe ME/CFS for years do gradually improve.

Two posts about bad experiences with LP have been moved to the LP discussion thread Posts about the BBC article and radio program have been moved to: BBC: Long Covid course [LP] is ‘exploiting people’, says ex-GB rower, 2024, article and radio program

A question on duration and scope of the project and funding: The orginal announcement of the project by the MEA, dated May 2023, says this: https://meassociation.org.uk/2023/05/me-association-funds-research-for-a-new-clinical-assessment-toolkit-in-nhs-me-cfs-specialist-services/ That suggests...

In out latest letter to Cochrane about harms we also formally presented the petition, including the list of organisations supporting the requests and asking them to read the comments on the petition.

Thank you for summarising our concerns so clearly. I feel like I'm going round in circles with this, and it's not good for my health. As I said on another thread on another topic, the Cochrane Exercise review fiasco, I feel like I'm shouting into a void and not an echo of a whisper is coming...