Thank you. It just wasn't clear to me what those numbers were showing, until you explained it. I didn't assume it was a smoking gun, but they did look weird.
So it's the increase caused by a switch from bimodel to Likert scoring. Thanks. That's helpful.
Yes, but (CNS) glial cells have been identified as a possible thing in fibro too. So it might be possible that if CNS glial cells are involved, so are those in the periphery?
Ah, my mistake. I missed the division and didn't realise the numbers didn't all run 0-1. Is the first score up to 3? And another looks like it tops out at 0.8? I can't read it too well. The others look like they're still 0-1. So it looks like you can safely ignore me.
But couldn't the...
ETA: This is wrong, so don't waste spoons reading it. (Moved this upfront as a civil service. ;))
Also, the numbers are multiplied together not averaged, so you'll always end up with a low number and this may exaggerate the effect of delayed testing.
Let's say you score almost full function...
Interesting. Looks like they're already looking at this for chronic pain. I wonder whether it fits with existing theories of central sensitisation or whether it will now replace those theories with something else?
As I understand it, WF10 is delivered by specialists via IV and not orally at home or by quacks. Either way, this should not be experimentally taken by patients.
Was it the ME Trust, by any chance? They deal with severe patients and worked with Jessica B (The Girl Behind Dark Glasses).
It's possible, as you say, that the physio doesn't see it as GET. Maybe discuss it with them? If the exercises are making you worse and you can't find a baseline, tell...
IMO, most won't want to diagnose or give medical advice. You might want to hire someone separately to do the analysis, although you can work it out yourself. The slideshow by Stevens upthread helps you figure out severity from VO2max alone and a drop in any one score might give you a clue where...
Fanning oneself can cause hundreds of 'steps' to materialise out of nowhere too. The counters may not accurately measure steps but they might be considered a loose measure of 'activity' (or at least movement) instead.
Comparing patients with each other is probably less useful than comparing...
I think studies that measure step counts usually show that there's a wide range of activity with ME patients. Some are under- or over-active (as in over 10K steps per day), some are in the middle, but these figures are largely consistent (i.e., there isn't evidence of boom and bust).
I think...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.