Search results

Interesting. I hadn't seen that COPE before. I was particularly struck by this line: In addition, the data were collected anonymously, which would further exempt the study from requiring formal ethical approval. Am I correct that here Crawley is claiming dispensation from gaining further...

We've tried many times to involve Goldacre but for some reason the former student of Simon Wessely refuses to look at it. He's too busy, apparently. Though not too busy to tweet about harassment of researchers by ME militants.

I have today received the result of the review undertaken by Bristol about the SMILE trial data.. They still claim an exemption. I'll refer it to the ICO. It usually takes about 4 months to get a decision.

I agree with all these comments. Definitely a case of a retweet but not an endorsement.

In Times this morning. Posted for information. It is a sympathetic article by Broadbent. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/muslim-fighter-with-me-who-left-an-arranged-marriage-to-win-world-title-svxhhzt57

Yes, it was just deleted from Youtube for copyright reasons.

Yes, the whole response is available here. https://t.co/aEdWadIhC6

I also asked about vexatious: 2. The number of requests refused by UoB as deemed vexatious (only relevant years are shown). 2010 – 0 2016 – 0 2017 – 5 3. The number of requests rejected by UoB as deemed otherwise exempt (only relevant years are shown). 2010 – 3 2016 – 3 2017 – 1 Please note...

I haven't looked through them properly. I don't have any additional documents.

Hehe. I'd recommend some painkillers to get through it. I think actually that is an important point: I suspect she kept the image because of its obvious impact, but continued to claim it was sent to her precisely in order to make the joke. It does get a reaction. (As well as making us...

If anyone is interested, I have uploaded the video. First part (of 2) here:

My understanding is that they will not be. As I said, a third party contacted Gill and Gill has said that he doesn't want to be involved in the dispute.

I haven't read the whole of this thread on here, but can say the following: Someone else contacted Gill. That person prefers not to be named. They forwarded me an email from Gill that said (direct quotation): This is a photo illustration I created for an article that was published in The...

University of Bristol has created a website with the documents from the SMILE trial. http://www.bristol.ac.uk/ccah/resea...bility/chronic-fatigue/smile/smile-documents/ Note that does not include the data, of course.

Yes, I'll get their reasons why they won't provide me with it on Friday. At least, that's what I'm anticipating.