Furthermore, it may seem that it makes little to no difference what type of face mask is used.
That is a pretty big red flag about the review quality, IMHO.
Arguably best to tick every formal admin box along the way, so they can't say you didn't try it.
One of the most powerful tools we have is going through all the formal processes, and getting the important stuff on the formal record. Then nobody can say they were not informed.
Creating a[nother] “Brain-Mind-Body Interface Disorders” Diagnostic Category Across Specialties
The less they understand what they are dealing with, the more frequently they invent new names for it.
It is their substitute for progress.
No improvement was established in patient's level of functioning.
Psychosomatic therapy could be an important treatment to improve PSS management.
Those two statements do not fit together.
Some patients may need more explicit attention to a shared biopsychosocial disease model, more focus on...
If it was the structure then the weakness would not transiently improve, the tremor would not transiently stop, and the gait would not improve.
One hell of an assumption/assertion.
Neuroscientifically, structure-function relationships are closely coupled, suggesting that functional disorders...
"The intervention will... ...encourage people to lead a values-based life"
Yeah, that's the problem. We don't have values.
How does this drivel get past funding and ethics review panels?
There it is.
The greatest sin in medicine is not being wrong, it is having to admit they don't have an answer. So they will invent the most ludicrous 'explanations' to avoid having to make that admission.
There is certainly psychological and moral pathology in this situation, but not in patients.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.