No, they never seem interested in naming individuals. Then they'd have to engage in debate about the truth about the individual critics that they try to smear as a vague group.
There are loads of good and informed patients that people will have never heard the names of. I don't know the other lay members on the committee, but that doesn't surprise me. Also, I do think that there's some reason to be careful about the right to privacy of those who did volunteer. The...
Nice one. This SMILE trial stuff burns me up though... reading a summary like this makes me twitch with frustration. I just can't believe how broken British medical research is.
A bit of a typo here?
Prospectively registered?
The more good expert witnesses the better, but at the end of the day it's the people with power/votes that really matter imo. Those appointed to the committee illustrate the sort of people that NICE think should have power over how we're treated.
Looks like the FINE site is down, but that presentation has been archived here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140811161130/http://www.fine-trial.net/downloads/CFS patient presentation.pdf
I think it's actually the opposite. Price did the 2004 version: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD003200.pub2/full
Larun then joined, and used the 2004 version of the basis/protocol for her review (although she then deviated from that protocol in the manner noted by...
Looks like Larun's PhD thesis was on 'Chronic fatigue syndrome - Knowledge, activity and challenges'
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=no&u=http://bora.uib.no/bitstream/handle/1956/5105/Dr.thesis_Lillebeth%2520Larun.pdf%3Fsequence%3D1&prev=search
From 2011.
I think that any worthwhile guidelines will need to emphasise the importance of warning patients about the sort of manipulative quackery that Chris Burton is currently promoting and making money from. I doubt that a process which decided Christ Burton should be one of the people with the most...
So they've got a podcast on the PACE trial and 'What role should the public play in science?', but this discussion involves just two PACE trial authors attacking their critics?
If only there was some organisation that would be able to provide access to a balanced range of independent scientific...
I actually wondered if that 60% "are supporters of PACE" could be a bit strong, as some have not commented on that. 'Connected to the provision of GET might have been better'? - I haven't looked at the details on all these people yet though.
Tagging @Eagle ICYI.
What a surprise that it looks like this is all about 'activists insist it's physical' and not at all about the problems with the science.
The gross simplification of the 'psychological vs physical' thing is there go to card for smearing people concerned about their work, but it's such a minor...
All the recent signs from NICE I've seen indicate an embrace of waffly holistic biopsychosocial care on the basis of junk-science. This is not a great sign for the ME/CFS guidelines, or for the UK as a society.
I'd read Munafò's replies as polite evasion. He is at Bristol, and I do not see him as remotely on-side or willing to speak out about the way patients have been condemned for pointing out problems with the research from people like Crawley.
I think that any worthwhile NICE guidelines will be...
It didn't look like this was instended as 'medical research'. Her twitter page said she was doing some sort of design work. I just googled her name and saw she'd done a sponsored run for MEA: https://www.justgiving.com/fundraising/rhiannonpayne
Looks like she was a teenager who fell ill and...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.