Search results

I didn't see that tweet. hm.

This has always been an issue with reporting on "long Covid." If you're measuring anyone with any symptom at 3 months or even six months, the numbers will be enormous. Early on, when everyone in ME-world predicted this, I assumed most had in mind a magnitude on the order of 5% or a bit more, on...

but did they rely on serology here? At a quick glance, I didn't see anything about that.

or perhaps they had another viral syndrome and weren't fully recovered at six months.

he has?

thanks!

Did this ever get satisfactorily responded to? And what would be the reason why, by the time of publication, Sir Simon wouldn't have wanted to have been an author?

from one perspective, it's a clever maneuver to try to resuscitate the Oxford criteria in this back-handed way. but it also feels like a desperation move or what is referred to as a "hail Mary pass" in our national concussion-causing celebrations called football. Could bringing back a...

is Alastair Miller also a military enthusiast like Garner?

Is this a previously identified thing or is it just a thing devised for this article?

this is an interesting point.

This is definitely what happened in Maeve O'Neill's case, according to the documentation.

This has always perplexed me. The FND epilepsy experts routinely argue that many patients have both. And they also argue that many with parkinson's have overlapping FND and Parkinson's as separate diagnoses. I was just told the same about functional cognitive disorder--that people can have both...

it seems reasonable to think that some might people have psychiatric issues that can lead to whatever weird physical manifestations--panic attacks would be an example. But the problem is extrapolating that in reverse direction and insisting that because it CAN in some cases lead to weird...

They relate to speech patterns they claim to have observed, if I remember. I'll look for one of the studies and post it.

They now actually claim they have "positive" signs to identify this. Unfortunately, the studies seem generally to identify people as having it based on signs, and then they test to see if they are more likely to have these signs than those without the disorder. It's circular reasoning.

I have only seem them used interchangeably. Not sure where this distinction has come from or who has made it.

There's a committee. Trudie Chalder chairs it.

it can have multiple meanings in US as well.