Search results

Many thanks! I very much take your point about what different views of exercise might mean - I can assure you it didn't mean opposite ends of the spectrum. But you can see the views of the people who were chosen for those roles from their public statements, as I did when I was looking into their...

Firstly, I agree that the long period without a public report was a serious problem: I can't do more now than apologize for that, and am happy to discuss how that came to be - with all the pressures of the pandemic, much that needed to be re-negotiated, and the desire to still reach the same...

Thanks for subscribing. Should come soon - that had to wait till after the holiday was over so someone could do it. We didn't want to draw attention to the report till the emails could go out on the same day as that announcement.

I am sorry about that. It'll be easier to discuss why it's taken so long soon. And next time I'll know to factor in more time for getting things online - and to note UK holidays. Meanwhile...when is midnight on 31 May in Pago Pago? Asking for a friend!! :geek:

I'm looking forward to the "behind the scenes" part of the process being over.

:emoji_face_palm: :emoji_joy:

I thought that too - but unfortunately it turns out there's actually one day less, because the 31st is a bank holiday in the UK (and that's where it needs to go online and the email will be sent out). Plus I want it to go online at a time when I'm not asleep. So going public might end up a day...

Yes, I didn't think it would - but then I had to set aside finalizing the report for something else that came up with this project. That's all done, and the reporting process is on track.

Oh yes! I wouldn't have given a timeframe if I wasn't sure.

Yes.

Timeframe's coming together - should be clear in the coming days.

There'll be a section on this in the first public report - and planning to do monthly public reports from then on.

2020 is the time I mean. I checked it & can't see why you said it appears I became a member.

I agree that it would have been far better to report on reasons for the delay sooner - but those reports, including explanations of that, are in process. No, there is no connection with the NICE guidelines process, and neither external pressure nor internal political pressure is holding up the...

Agree. Grumpy is obviously justified. Working on resolving that disconnect.

No - not going to publicly pre-empt the report anywhere.

That hasn't been an issue at all, I'm pleased to say.

Am I still there? I thought I had been removed. (It turns out they had added a bunch of people who qualified for membership from past involvement that had apparently been overlooked and emailed us to let us know: while it's true I qualify for membership, I do not want to be one.)

The communication method with the IAG is the email address as publicized, and we received expressions of interest from individuals and groups. How the process evolved will be detailed in the report, and I'll be happy to discuss it further after that.