Search results

There is a big problem when medical systems (funding, teaching etc) do not consider human nature as central to their practise. A system that expects doctors to provide perfect advice and patients to always follow that advice is pure fantasy.

There is a researcher here who I have spoken to who has studied both (and hasn't found anything interesting in common). They are not the same thing of course, but commonalities might be interesting.

Didn't this group disprove the "sustained arousal" hypothesis with several of their studies including a drug trial. Why are they still talking about it?

Listing seems recent, DOI doesn't work yet. I don't understand how TLR3 ties into the results they've reported.

This is really long, is there anything specific you were referring to?

Same. For me it caused morning drowsiness, POTS etc.

https://translate.google.com.au/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?pid=S1135-57272016000100206&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en&edit-text=&act=url "Stressful Events in the Onset of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome" Iraida Gimeno Pi 1 , Mª Luisa Guitard...

Who is disrupting too? Disruption inception, I'm confused.