TC is just checking a fact about the timeline for the guidelines.
Any quick help appreciated. Links if possible to support.
Why was there a review started in 2017?
Am I right in saying 2007 committee reported. Same committee reviewed in 2010 said all is well. Patients called for new review...
This tweet by Phil Hammond needs to be seen alongside the one by Sharpe and the admission of harm by Goddard.
For over 30 years we have been told that GET is not exercise, that it succeeds through incremental increases and that there is no evidence of harm.
They're clueless. It's a complete...
This may help answer those questions.
https://www.coyneoftherealm.com/2017/06/07/nice-guidelines-are-discrepant-with-meta-analyses-and-based-on-political-considerations-an-exchange/
Indian man sleeps 300 days a year.
https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/rajasthan-rare-disorder-axis-hypersomnia-kumbhkarna-1829228-2021-07-17
From
(£) https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/rip-van-winkle-of-india-sleeps-for-three-weeks-out-of-four-qg89w9v9l
I did a brief search on Newman. She has done previous work for the BMJ. She's also written articles for 'The Bureau of Investigative Journalism' on FII.
EG:
https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2018-04-18/treating-fii-the-gosh-approach...
How the Lancet lost our trust Stuart Ritchie The Spectator (UK) 26/06/2021
A few of us have tried to get Ritchie interested in the PACE trial, but he has previously refused. But since it now seems to support his argument, he does cautiously mention it...
bad science
blinding
breastfeeding
coi
conflicts of interest
confounding
correction
depression
elisabeth bik
fraud
gaming
lancet
meta-analysis
methodology
observational study
pace trial
reporting
retraction watch
ritchie
science writing
stuart ritchie
the spectator
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.