Search results

Establishment circle-jerking and arse-covering par excellence.

Removing the BPS clinicians/researchers from the equation would probably be enough of a solution on its own.

Protecting one's ego is at least as powerful a motivation as protecting one's income, empire, etc. To admit you were seriously wrong, even reckless and callous, and caused terrible harm on a massive scale, is too great a psychological and moral hurdle for most to face. Most of the guilty in the...

That agenda doesn't look too hidden to me. Which would require a therapy that actually works. It's a business & political model, not a scientific one.

is there a role for a transdiagnostic approach? No. Certainly not if you are involved.

3. Potential serious, long-term damage to young/healthy also from this virus. This increasingly known risk alone renders any talk of 'herd immunity' utter madness. The long term cost to society would be horrendous.

Direct YT link from mask fit story above:

Statistical power, come on down.

The one thing guaranteed to make a bad thing happen, is to be absolutely sure it couldn't happen.

Shameless and irresponsible marketing spin. This is my surprised face: :bored:

There are also degrees and types of wrong.

I think you mean sabotaged from within.

Henrik Vogt is an arrogant delusional moron, and a clear and present danger to all patients. And that is the polite version.

That's scary. :eek:

So, turns out the preppers were right?

Gotta admit, I am impressed by just how much wrong can be packed into so few words. Literally every point is false. It takes a special kind of wilful ignorance and indifference to the suffering it causes to be that consistently wrong. aka Sophistry and propaganda.

It's déjà vu all over again. :(

A small percentage of coronavirus patients are responsible for major outbreaks, the largest study-to-date of transmission suggests. Is this true for other infectious diseases?

Good timing. Tomorrow is payday. :thumbup:

Neither do they.