Fair enough
Indeed, though your goal seems to be to convince them to do better.
Its not quite this simple, a provider is in the business of providing care, if they provide bad care they are of course not helping patients. The reason for providing sub optimal care varies in disease to disease...
All thats needed is to not make threats, even obviously bogus ones. It does mean not saying everything thats on our minds in the ways we may want to but the alternative is worse. While most of us live in countries that make it legal to use common expressions we are a population living under...
Fair enough, sounds very familiar in politics
In answer to your original query i suspect the expression power corrupts would apply.
This may be relevant/interesting
https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2016/10/18/13285196/2016-trump-clinton-psychology-power
But a specialist can do further testing to rule out other rare diseases (including genetic testing) and would be able to trial off label treatments that some patients have found helpful that your PCP knows nothing about (points you can appeal with).
Also a specialist would know about the current...
That is a good one, though i prefer real science because it adds oomph to the PACE pusher its being deployed against.
i kinda like #Justice4pwME
Though we can have more then one in the end, many people seem to use several hashtags
But if you google PWME you get the answer very quickly
I would, i think my favourite is #RealScience4pwME (not on your list)
It would work great when dealing with PACE pushers
Perhaps you should run a poll with all then a second poll with the top 5?
A good chiropractor can handle many back pain issues (not all, once too much damage is done its permanent), but the profession has shot itself in the foot by clinging to debunked 18th century stupidity. Then you get chiros who keep you coming back forever further staining the profession's...
Is this a joke, your saying that being smart about how you do things is a bad idea because throwing everything at a problem without thinking it through is the best strategy. And just so we are clear choosing to use no strategy is a strategy, just not a good one.
If we placed a text message at...
Double standards are a common device for reality deniers.
They also will use abstract or ridiculous arguments, so if you asked him i expect he would say something to the effect of he earned his position and his funding comes from a 'reputable' source.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.